People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Acheroy, S.
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (5/5 displayed)
- 2016Determination of the radial profile of the photoelastic coefficient of plastic optical fibers
- 2016Determination of the radial profile of the photoelastic coefficient of polymer optical fibers
- 2015Algorithms for determining the radial profile of the photoelastic coefficient in glass and polymer optical fibrescitations
- 2014On a possible method to measure the radial profile of the photoelastic constant in step-index optical fiber
- 2013Influence of measurement noise on the determination of the radial profile of the photoelastic coefficient in step-index optical fibres
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Algorithms for determining the radial profile of the photoelastic coefficient in glass and polymer optical fibres
Abstract
We discuss two algorithms to determine the value and the radial profile of the photoelastic coefficient C in glass and polymer optical fibers. We conclude that C is constant over the fiber cross-sections, with exception of silica glass fibers containing a fluorine-doped depressed cladding. In the undoped and Ge-doped parts of these silica glass fibers we find a consistent value for C that is slightly larger than in bulk silica. In the fluorine-doped trenches of the absolute value of C decreases with about 27%. In polymethyl methacrylate optical fibers, the value of C significantly varies from fiber to fiber. (C) 2015 Optical Society of America