Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Jones, R. M.

  • Google
  • 3
  • 6
  • 32

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2008X-band crab cavities for the CLIC beam delivery systemcitations
  • 2003Geomechanical, microstructural and petrophysical evolution in experimentally reactivated cataclasites: applications to fault seal prediction. Discussion3citations
  • 2002Geomechanical, microstructural and petrophysical evolution in experimentally reactivated cataclasites: applications to fault seal prediction29citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Tantawi, S.
1 / 1 shared
Abram, Thomas
1 / 2 shared
Dolgashev, V.
1 / 1 shared
Ambattu, Praveen
1 / 1 shared
Dexter, Amos
1 / 1 shared
Burt, Graeme Campbell
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2008
2003
2002

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Tantawi, S.
  • Abram, Thomas
  • Dolgashev, V.
  • Ambattu, Praveen
  • Dexter, Amos
  • Burt, Graeme Campbell
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Geomechanical, microstructural and petrophysical evolution in experimentally reactivated cataclasites: applications to fault seal prediction. Discussion

  • Jones, R. M.
Abstract

Failure envelopes for well-lithified cataclastic fault rocks from the Otway Basin, Australia, where fault reactivation is a significant risk to trap integrity, have been determined through triaxial testing. Geomechanical analyses indicate that cemented cataclasites exhibit significant cohesive strength and that fault reactivation and trap breach is influenced by the development of shear, tensile and mixed-mode fractures. The mechanics of the fracturing process are influenced by grain strength and cataclasite morphology. Cemented cataclasites are more prone to failure than reservoir sandstones under low differential stress conditions as a result of a relatively low cohesive strength and higher friction coefficient. As such, the geomechanical property differential between cataclastic faults and undeformed reservoir strata may impact significantly on seal integrity during reactivation. Intact cataclasite seal capacity exceeds 2400 psi (16.5 MPa). Following reactivation seal capacity is reduced ~95% as a result of the development of a highly connected fracture network. The tensile strength of these cataclastic faults allows failure to occur by shear, tensile and mixed mode fracturing. This suggests that geomechanical tools used to predict trap breaching by reactivation that assume cohesionless frictional failure may significantly underestimate seal risk. Determination of fault seal risk can, therefore, be significantly enhanced by multi-disciplinary research efforts combining field and laboratory scale geomechanical analysis with microstructural and petrophysical property description. (Author supplied)

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • morphology
  • grain
  • strength
  • tensile strength