Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Demirel, G.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 3
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2024DEVELOPMENT OF 4D PRINTING STRATEGY FOR SKELETAL MUSCLE TISSUE ENGINEERINGcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Yilgor, P.
1 / 6 shared
Liman, G.
1 / 1 shared
Ergene, E.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2024

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Yilgor, P.
  • Liman, G.
  • Ergene, E.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

DEVELOPMENT OF 4D PRINTING STRATEGY FOR SKELETAL MUSCLE TISSUE ENGINEERING

  • Yilgor, P.
  • Demirel, G.
  • Liman, G.
  • Ergene, E.
Abstract

<jats:p>Skeletal muscle tissue engineering has made progress towards production of functional tissues in line with the development in materials science and fabrication techniques. In particular, combining the specificity of 3D printing with smart materials has introduced a new concept called the 4D printing. Inspired by the unique properties of smart/responsive materials, we designed a bioink made of gelatin, a polymer with well-known cell compatibility, to be 3D printed on a magnetically responsive substrate. Gelatin was made photocrosslinkable by the methacrylate reaction (GELMA), and its viscosity was finetuned by blending with alginate which was later removed by alginate lyase treatment, so that the printability of the bioink as well as the cell viability can be finetuned. C2C12 mouse myoblasts-laden bioink was then 3D printed on a magnetic substrate for 4D shape-shifting. The magnetic substrate was produced using silicon rubber (EcoFlex) and carbonyl iron powders. After 3D printing, the bioink was crosslinked on the substrate, and the substrate was rolled with the help of a permanent magnet. Unrolled (Open) samples were used as the control group. The stiffness of the bioink matrix was found to be in the range of 13–45 kPa, which is the appropriate value for the adhesion of C2C12 cells. In the cell viability analysis, it was observed that the cells survived and could proliferate within the 7-day duration of the experiment. As a result of the immunofluorescence test, compared to the Open Group, more cell nuclei were observed overlapping MyoD1 expression in the Rolled Group; this indicated that the cells in these samples had more cell-cell interactions and therefore tended to form more myotubes.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Acknowledgements:</jats:bold> This research was supported by the TÜBİTAK 2211-A and YÖK 100/2000 scholarship programs.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • experiment
  • viscosity
  • Silicon
  • iron
  • rubber
  • iron powder