Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Kato, Taichiro

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2024Tensile and creep properties of small specimens of reduced-activation ferritic steel F82H, and the correlation to standard specimen datacitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Tanigawa, Hiroyasu
1 / 1 shared
Shen, Jingjie
1 / 2 shared
Ando, Masami
1 / 1 shared
Nagasaka, Takuya
1 / 13 shared
Nozawa, Takashi
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2024

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Tanigawa, Hiroyasu
  • Shen, Jingjie
  • Ando, Masami
  • Nagasaka, Takuya
  • Nozawa, Takashi
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Tensile and creep properties of small specimens of reduced-activation ferritic steel F82H, and the correlation to standard specimen data

  • Tanigawa, Hiroyasu
  • Shen, Jingjie
  • Ando, Masami
  • Nagasaka, Takuya
  • Kato, Taichiro
  • Nozawa, Takashi
Abstract

<ns3:p>Background A reduced-activation ferritic/martensitic (RAFM) steel, F82H steel, is the primary candidate structural material for fusion reactor blanket. Small specimen test technique is essential to develop the blanket materials using limited irradiation volume in high flux neutron field. An international collaboration activity “Towards the Standardization of Small Specimen Test Techniques for Fusion Applications” has been initiated under the framework of the International Atomic Energy Agency Coordinated Research Project for Phase I from 2017 to 2021, and Phase II from 2022 to 2026. The present paper reports the preliminary results on tensile and creep tests as a summary of the above Phase I activity. Methods Tensile and creep tests were conducted at 550 and 650°C, using flat-plate SSJ type small specimens with various gauge thickness ranged from 0.14 to 1.2 mm, while gauge length and width are 5 and 1.2 mm, respectively. In addition, round bar type standard specimens with a gauge geometry of 6 mm in diameter and 30 mm in length was also tested for comparison. Results Tensile yield stress, ultimate tensile strength and uniform elongation were independent of the gauge thickness of SSJ specimens, and agreed with the data from the standard size specimens. On the other hand, total elongation was decreased with decreasing the thickness. In creep tests, rupture time was decreased with decreasing the gauge thickness of SSJ specimens. Standard size specimens exhibited shorter rupture time than the SSJ specimens. Conclusions The SSJ type specimens provided similar tensile parameters to those from the standard specimen, except total elongation. Creep rupture time of the SSJ specimens were different from the standard specimen, and decreased with decreasing the gauge thickness.</ns3:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • phase
  • strength
  • steel
  • activation
  • tensile strength
  • creep
  • creep test