Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Browne, Martin

  • Google
  • 9
  • 24
  • 212

University of Southampton

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (9/9 displayed)

  • 2022Measuring the elastic modulus of soft biomaterials using nanoindentation26citations
  • 2019Characterising the compressive anisotropic properties of analogue bone using optical strain measurement8citations
  • 2018Image-based high strain rate testing of orthopaedic bone cement1citations
  • 2018A practical procedure for measuring the stiffness of foam like materials16citations
  • 2014The application of digital volume correlation (DVC) to study the microstructural behaviour of trabecular bone during compression141citations
  • 2014A fatigue assessment technique for modular and pre-stressed orthopaedic implants4citations
  • 2014Predicting bone remodelling around root-form dental implantscitations
  • 2010Performance of the resurfaced hip. Part 1: the influence of the prosthesis size and positioning on the remodelling and fracture of the femoral neck10citations
  • 2008Modular ceramic bearings on a CFRP total hip replacement femoral stem6citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Sánchez-Abella, Laura
1 / 1 shared
Begiristain, Eider
1 / 1 shared
Xu, Dichu
1 / 7 shared
Harvey, Terence
1 / 12 shared
Cook, Richard
1 / 16 shared
Domínguez, Cristina
1 / 2 shared
Pierron, Fabrice
4 / 41 shared
Dickinson, Alexander
6 / 6 shared
Marter, Alexander
2 / 2 shared
Fong, Yin Ki
1 / 1 shared
Seghir, Rian
1 / 22 shared
Fletcher, Lloyd
1 / 12 shared
Regal, Xavier
1 / 2 shared
Sinclair, I.
1 / 47 shared
Boardman, Richard P.
1 / 12 shared
Mavrogordato, Mark
1 / 8 shared
Hollis, D.
1 / 2 shared
Gillard, F.
1 / 1 shared
Roques, A. C.
1 / 1 shared
Taylor, A. C.
1 / 10 shared
Taylor, Andy
1 / 3 shared
Woods, Christopher
1 / 1 shared
Taylor, Andrew C.
1 / 1 shared
Taylor, Andrew
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2019
2018
2014
2010
2008

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Sánchez-Abella, Laura
  • Begiristain, Eider
  • Xu, Dichu
  • Harvey, Terence
  • Cook, Richard
  • Domínguez, Cristina
  • Pierron, Fabrice
  • Dickinson, Alexander
  • Marter, Alexander
  • Fong, Yin Ki
  • Seghir, Rian
  • Fletcher, Lloyd
  • Regal, Xavier
  • Sinclair, I.
  • Boardman, Richard P.
  • Mavrogordato, Mark
  • Hollis, D.
  • Gillard, F.
  • Roques, A. C.
  • Taylor, A. C.
  • Taylor, Andy
  • Woods, Christopher
  • Taylor, Andrew C.
  • Taylor, Andrew
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Performance of the resurfaced hip. Part 1: the influence of the prosthesis size and positioning on the remodelling and fracture of the femoral neck

  • Dickinson, Alexander
  • Browne, Martin
  • Taylor, Andrew C.
Abstract

Hip resurfacing is an established treatment for osteoarthritis in young active patients. Failure modes include femoral neck fracture and prosthesis loosening, which may be associated with medium-term bone adaptation, including femoral neck narrowing and densification around the prosthesis stem.<br/><br/>Finite element modelling was used to indicate the effects of prosthesis sizing and positioning on the bone remodelling and fracture strength under a range of normal and traumatic loads, with the aim of understanding these failure modes better.<br/><br/>The simulations predicted increased superior femoral neck stress shielding in young patients with small prostheses, which required shortening of the femoral neck to give an acceptable implant–bone interface. <br/><br/>However, with a larger prosthesis, natural femoral head centre recreation in the implanted state was possible; therefore stress shielding was restricted to the prosthesis interior, and its extent was less sensitive to prosthesis orientation. With valgus orientation, the implanted neck strength was, at worst, within 3 per cent of its intact strength.<br/><br/>The study suggests that femoral neck narrowing may be linked to a reduction in the horizontal femoral offset, occurring if the prosthesis is excessively undersized. As such, hip resurfacing should aim to reproduce the natural femoral head centre, and, for valgus prosthesis orientation, to avoid femoral neck fracture.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • simulation
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • strength
  • hot isostatic pressing
  • densification