| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Ibraim, Erdin
University of Bristol
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (26/26 displayed)
- 2024An evaluation of non-linear undrained behaviour in the moderate strain range for fine-grained soilscitations
- 2024Comparison of simple stress-strain models in the moderate strain range for fine-grained soils:A reviewcitations
- 2024Comparison of simple stress-strain models in the moderate strain range for fine-grained soilscitations
- 2021Stiffness of granular soils under long-term multiaxial cyclic loadingcitations
- 20213D FE-informed laboratory soil testing for the design of offshore wind turbine monopilescitations
- 2021Stiffness of artificially cemented sands:insight on characterisation through empirical power relationshipscitations
- 2021Stiffness of artificially cemented sandscitations
- 2019Strength anisotropy of fibre-reinforced sands under multiaxial loadingcitations
- 2019Stiffness of lightly cemented sand under multiaxial loadingcitations
- 2019Stiffness of lightly cemented sand under multiaxial loadingcitations
- 2019Effect of orientation of principal stress axes on cyclic liquefaction potential of soils
- 2019Effect of orientation of principal stress axes on cyclic liquefaction potential of soils
- 2018Compacted Chalk Putty-Cement Blends:Mechanical Properties and Performancecitations
- 2018Compacted Chalk Putty-Cement Blendscitations
- 2017General Report:
- 2017Particle soil crushing: passive detection and interpretation
- 2017Evolution of elastic properties of granular soils under very large of number of multiaxial stress cycles
- 2016Evolution of small strain stiffness of granular soils with a large number of small loading cycles in the 3-D multiaxial stress space
- 2015Quantitative assessment of the influence of surface roughness on soil stiffnesscitations
- 2014Micromechanics of seismic wave propagation in granular materialscitations
- 2013Experimental and numerical assessment of a cubical sample produced by pluviationcitations
- 2012Characterization of artificial spherical particles for DEM validation studiescitations
- 2012Characterization of artificial spherical particles for DEM validation studiescitations
- 2012Characterization of artificial, spherical sized particles for DEM validation studies ; Characterization of artificial spherical particles for DEM validation studiescitations
- 2010Static liquefaction of fibre reinforced sand under monotonic loadingcitations
- 2009Failure resistant soils for geotechnical infrastructure
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
document
Micromechanics of seismic wave propagation in granular materials
Abstract
<p>In this study high quality experimental studies on an analogue soil in a cubical cell are compared with discrete element simulations to investigate the propagation of waves through the soil sample from a grain-scale perspective. Examination of the data resulting from the two analyses confirms the complexity surrounding interpretation methods used for small-strain stiffness evaluation. Complex, but similar, responses to perturbations generated by bender/extender piezoceramic elements in experiments and controlled movement of particles in numerical simulations were observed. In both cases tests were repeated for a range of confining pressures and the system response was interpreted to give values of the shear and constrained moduli. At a given stress level, there was good agreement between the shear modulus values, however the laboratory test data gave higher constrained modulus values.</p>