• Wanje, George
• Richardson, Barbra A.
• Mwaringa, Emily
• Sherr, Kenneth
• Barnabas, Ruanne V.
• Mandaliya, Kishorchandra
• Mcclelland, R. Scott
• Eastment, Mckenna
• Long, Jessica E.

Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>Significant gaps remain in HIV testing and counseling (HTC) in family planning (FP) clinics. To address these gaps, our group tested an implementation strategy called the Systems Analysis and Improvement Approach (SAIA), an evidenced-based multi-component implementation strategy focused on improving entire care cascades. In a cluster randomized trial of 24 FP clinics in Mombasa County, Kenya, SAIA led to a significant increase in HTC in intervention clinics compared to control clinics. The objective of this manuscript was to evaluate SAIA using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and assess the Implementation Outcomes Framework outcomes of acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>This qualitative assessment was nested within the cluster-randomized trial. Data collection included questionnaires to assess modifiable and non-modifiable health system factors related to HTC and in-depth interviews to query clinic norms, priorities, communication strategies, and readiness for change. The primary outcomes of interest were feasibility, appropriateness, and acceptability of SAIA. Data on inner setting and structural characteristics of FP clinics were collected to inform how context may impact outcomes. All interviews were recorded and analyzed using a rapid assessment approach<jats:italic>.</jats:italic></jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Of the 12 intervention clinics, 6 (50%) were public facilities. Availability of resources varied by clinic. Most clinics had a positive implementation climate, engaged leadership, and access to resources and information. While not all clinics identified HTC as a clinic priority, most reported a strong culture of embracing change and recognition of the importance of HIV testing within FP clinics. Interviews highlighted very high acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of SAIA. The implementation strategy was not complicated and fit well into existing clinic processes. In particular, staff appreciated that SAIA allowed clinic staff to generate contextually relevant solutions that they implemented.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>SAIA was implemented in FP clinics of varying sizes, capacity, and management support and was found to be acceptable, appropriate, and feasible. The agency that clinic staff felt in proposing and implementing their own solutions was likely part of SAIA’s success. We anticipate this will continue to be a mechanism of SAIA’s success when it is scaled up to more clinics in future trials.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Trial registration</jats:title><jats:p>ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02994355) registered 16 December 2016.</jats:p></jats:sec>

Topics

• impedance spectroscopy
• cluster
• size-exclusion chromatography