Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Liu, Kathy

  • Google
  • 2
  • 38
  • 7

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2023Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of amustaline/glutathione pathogen-reduced RBCs in complex cardiac surgery: the Red Cell Pathogen Inactivation (ReCePI) study—protocol for a phase 3, randomized, controlled trial7citations
  • 2021Conducting Polymer‐Based Granular Hydrogels for Injectable 3D Cell Scaffoldscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Azadian, Matine
1 / 1 shared
Santhanam, Sruthi
1 / 1 shared
Mcconnell, Kelly Wu
1 / 1 shared
Feig, Vivian Rachel
1 / 1 shared
Bao, Zhenan
1 / 20 shared
Tran, Helen
1 / 1 shared
George, Paul M.
1 / 1 shared
Brunel, Lucia Giulia
1 / 1 shared
Huang, Zhuojun
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2021

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Azadian, Matine
  • Santhanam, Sruthi
  • Mcconnell, Kelly Wu
  • Feig, Vivian Rachel
  • Bao, Zhenan
  • Tran, Helen
  • George, Paul M.
  • Brunel, Lucia Giulia
  • Huang, Zhuojun
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of amustaline/glutathione pathogen-reduced RBCs in complex cardiac surgery: the Red Cell Pathogen Inactivation (ReCePI) study—protocol for a phase 3, randomized, controlled trial

  • Gammon, Richard R.
  • Sniecinski, Roman M.
  • Nuttall, Gregory A.
  • Bentow, Stanley
  • Reece, T. Brett
  • Benjamin, Richard
  • Beaver, Thomas M.
  • Gorham, James D.
  • Kaplan, Alesia
  • Varrone, Jeanne
  • Ipe, Tina S.
  • Group, For The Recepi Study
  • Snyder, Edward L.
  • Lopez-Plaza, Ileana
  • Welsby, Ian J.
  • Alsammak, Mohamed
  • Sadler, Patrick
  • Pearl, Ronald G.
  • Liu, Kathy
  • Sarode, Ravi
  • Corash, Laurence
  • Pitman, John
  • Pelletier, J. Peter R.
  • Mcneil, John S.
  • Mufti, Nina
  • Davenport, Robertson D.
  • Sekela, Michael E.
  • Benharash, Peyman
  • Toyoda, Yoshiya
  • Sodha, Neel R.
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is a critical supportive therapy in cardiovascular surgery (CVS). Donor selection and testing have reduced the risk of transfusion-transmitted infections; however, risks remain from bacteria, emerging viruses, pathogens for which testing is not performed and from residual donor leukocytes. Amustaline (S-303)/glutathione (GSH) treatment pathogen reduction technology is designed to inactivate a broad spectrum of infectious agents and leukocytes in RBC concentrates. The ReCePI study is a Phase 3 clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pathogen-reduced RBCs transfused for acute anemia in CVS compared to conventional RBCs, and to assess the clinical significance of treatment-emergent RBC antibodies.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>ReCePI is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, active-controlled, parallel-design, non-inferiority study. Eligible subjects will be randomized up to 7 days before surgery to receive either leukoreduced Test (pathogen reduced) or Control (conventional) RBCs from surgery up to day 7 post-surgery. The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of patients transfused with at least one study transfusion with an acute kidney injury (AKI) diagnosis defined as any increased serum creatinine (sCr) level ≥ 0.3 mg/dL (or 26.5 µmol/L) from pre-surgery baseline within 48 ± 4 h of the end of surgery. The primary safety endpoints are the proportion of patients with any treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) related to study RBC transfusion through 28 days, and the proportion of patients with treatment-emergent antibodies with confirmed specificity to pathogen-reduced RBCs through 75 days after the last study transfusion. With ≥ 292 evaluable, transfused patients (&gt; 146 per arm), the study has 80% power to demonstrate non-inferiority, defined as a Test group AKI incidence increase of no more than 50% of the Control group rate, assuming a Control incidence of 30%.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Discussion</jats:title><jats:p>RBCs are transfused to prevent tissue hypoxia caused by surgery-induced bleeding and anemia. AKI is a sensitive indicator of renal hypoxia and a novel endpoint for assessing RBC efficacy. The ReCePI study is intended to demonstrate the non-inferiority of pathogen-reduced RBCs to conventional RBCs in the support of renal tissue oxygenation due to acute anemia and to characterize the incidence of treatment-related antibodies to RBCs.</jats:p></jats:sec>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • phase
  • size-exclusion chromatography