• Crooks, James L.
• James, Katherine A.
• Paull, Sara H.
• Lund, Andrea J.
• Allshouse, William B.
• Grover, Elise
• Liu, Yang
• Carlton, Elizabeth J.

Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>Although the presence of intermediate snails is a necessary condition for local schistosomiasis transmission to occur, using them as surveillance targets in areas approaching elimination is challenging because the patchy and dynamic quality of snail host habitats makes collecting and testing snails labor-intensive. Meanwhile, geospatial analyses that rely on remotely sensed data are becoming popular tools for identifying environmental conditions that contribute to pathogen emergence and persistence.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>In this study, we assessed whether open-source environmental data can be used to predict the presence of human <jats:italic>Schistosoma japonicum</jats:italic> infections among households with a similar or improved degree of accuracy compared to prediction models developed using data from comprehensive snail surveys. To do this, we used infection data collected from rural communities in Southwestern China in 2016 to develop and compare the predictive performance of two Random Forest machine learning models: one built using snail survey data, and one using open-source environmental data.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>The environmental data models outperformed the snail data models in predicting household <jats:italic>S. japonicum</jats:italic> infection with an estimated accuracy and Cohen’s kappa value of 0.89 and 0.49, respectively, in the environmental model, compared to an accuracy and kappa of 0.86 and 0.37 for the snail model. The Normalized Difference in Water Index (an indicator of surface water presence) within half to one kilometer of the home and the distance from the home to the nearest road were among the top performing predictors in our final model. Homes were more likely to have infected residents if they were further from roads, or nearer to waterways.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>Our results suggest that in low-transmission environments, leveraging open-source environmental data can yield more accurate identification of pockets of human infection than using snail surveys. Furthermore, the variable importance measures from our models point to aspects of the local environment that may indicate increased risk of schistosomiasis. For example, households were more likely to have infected residents if they were further from roads or were surrounded by more surface water, highlighting areas to target in future surveillance and control efforts.</jats:p></jats:sec>

Topics

• impedance spectroscopy
• surface
• random
• size-exclusion chromatography
• machine learning