Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Cheung, Emily Y.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 13
  • 22

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2022Predictive model for long COVID in children 3 months after a SARS-CoV-2 PCR test22citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Crawley, Esther
1 / 1 shared
Mcowat, Kelsey
1 / 1 shared
Pereira, Snehal M. Pinto
1 / 1 shared
Dalrymple, Emma
1 / 1 shared
Shafran, Roz
1 / 1 shared
Rojas, Natalia
1 / 1 shared
Stephenson, Terence
1 / 1 shared
Stavola, Bianca L. De
1 / 1 shared
Ladhani, Shamez N.
1 / 2 shared
Nugawela, Manjula D.
1 / 1 shared
Simmons, Ruth
1 / 3 shared
Ford, Tamsin
1 / 1 shared
Heyman, Isobel
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Crawley, Esther
  • Mcowat, Kelsey
  • Pereira, Snehal M. Pinto
  • Dalrymple, Emma
  • Shafran, Roz
  • Rojas, Natalia
  • Stephenson, Terence
  • Stavola, Bianca L. De
  • Ladhani, Shamez N.
  • Nugawela, Manjula D.
  • Simmons, Ruth
  • Ford, Tamsin
  • Heyman, Isobel
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Predictive model for long COVID in children 3 months after a SARS-CoV-2 PCR test

  • Crawley, Esther
  • Mcowat, Kelsey
  • Pereira, Snehal M. Pinto
  • Dalrymple, Emma
  • Shafran, Roz
  • Rojas, Natalia
  • Stephenson, Terence
  • Stavola, Bianca L. De
  • Cheung, Emily Y.
  • Ladhani, Shamez N.
  • Nugawela, Manjula D.
  • Simmons, Ruth
  • Ford, Tamsin
  • Heyman, Isobel
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>To update and internally validate a model to predict children and young people (CYP) most likely to experience long COVID (i.e. at least one impairing symptom) 3 months after SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing and to determine whether the impact of predictors differed by SARS-CoV-2 status.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Data from a nationally matched cohort of SARS-CoV-2 test-positive and test-negative CYP aged 11–17 years was used. The main outcome measure, long COVID, was defined as one or more impairing symptoms 3 months after PCR testing. Potential pre-specified predictors included SARS-CoV-2 status, sex, age, ethnicity, deprivation, quality of life/functioning (five EQ-5D-Y items), physical and mental health and loneliness (prior to testing) and number of symptoms at testing. The model was developed using logistic regression; performance was assessed using calibration and discrimination measures; internal validation was performed via bootstrapping and the final model was adjusted for overfitting.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>A total of 7139 (3246 test-positives, 3893 test-negatives) completing a questionnaire 3 months post-test were included. 25.2% (817/3246) of SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positives and 18.5% (719/3893) of SARS-CoV-2 PCR-negatives had one or more impairing symptoms 3 months post-test. The final model contained SARS-CoV-2 status, number of symptoms at testing, sex, age, ethnicity, physical and mental health, loneliness and four EQ-5D-Y items before testing. Internal validation showed minimal overfitting with excellent calibration and discrimination measures (optimism-adjusted calibration slope: 0.96575; C-statistic: 0.83130).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>We updated a risk prediction equation to identify those most at risk of long COVID 3 months after a SARS-CoV-2 PCR test which could serve as a useful triage and management tool for CYP during the ongoing pandemic. External validation is required before large-scale implementation.</jats:p></jats:sec>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • size-exclusion chromatography