Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Nowicki, Adam

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 25

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2022Evaluation of biofilm formation on acrylic resins used to fabricate dental temporary restorations with the use of 3D printing technology25citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Pałka, Łukasz
1 / 1 shared
Baldy-Chudzik, Katarzyna
1 / 1 shared
Zimoch-Korzycka, Anna
1 / 6 shared
Arkusz, Katarzyna
1 / 2 shared
Mazurek-Popczyk, Justyna
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Pałka, Łukasz
  • Baldy-Chudzik, Katarzyna
  • Zimoch-Korzycka, Anna
  • Arkusz, Katarzyna
  • Mazurek-Popczyk, Justyna
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Evaluation of biofilm formation on acrylic resins used to fabricate dental temporary restorations with the use of 3D printing technology

  • Nowicki, Adam
  • Pałka, Łukasz
  • Baldy-Chudzik, Katarzyna
  • Zimoch-Korzycka, Anna
  • Arkusz, Katarzyna
  • Mazurek-Popczyk, Justyna
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>Temporary implant-retained restorations are required to support function and esthetics of the masticatory system until the final restoration is completed and delivered. Acrylic resins are commonly used in prosthetic dentistry and lately they have been used in three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. Since this technology it is fairly new, the number of studies on their susceptibility to microbial adhesion is low. Restorations placed even for a short period of time may become the reservoir for microorganisms that may affect the peri-implant tissues and trigger inflammation endangering further procedures. The aim of the study was to test the biofilm formation on acrylamide resins used to fabricate temporary restorations in 3D printing technology and to assess if the post-processing impacts microbial adhesion. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Disk-shaped samples were manufactured using the 3D printing technique from three commercially available UV-curable resins consisting of acrylate and methacrylate oligomers with various time and inhibitors of polymerization (NextDent MFH bleach, NextDent 3D Plus, MazicD Temp). The tested samples were raw, polished and glazed. The ability to create biofilm by oral <jats:italic>streptococci</jats:italic> (<jats:italic>S. mutans</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>S. sanguinis, S. oralis, S. mitis</jats:italic>) was tested, as well as species with higher pathogenic potential: <jats:italic>Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>Candida albicans</jats:italic>. The roughness of the materials was measured by an atomic force microscope. Biofilm formation was assessed after 72 h of incubation by crystal violet staining with absorbance measurement, quantification of viable microorganisms, and imaging with a scanning electron microscope (SEM).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Each tested species formed the biofilm on the samples of all three resins. Post-production processing resulted in reduced roughness parameters and biofilm abundance. Polishing and glazing reduced roughness parameters significantly in the NextDent resin group, while glazing alone caused significant surface smoothing in Mazic Temp. A thin layer of microbial biofilm covered glazed resin surfaces with a small number of microorganisms for all tested strains except <jats:italic>S. oralis</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>S. epidermidis,</jats:italic> while raw and polished surfaces were covered with a dense biofilm, rich in microorganisms.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>UV-curing acrylic resins used for fabricating temporary restorations in the 3D technology are the interim solution, but are susceptible to adhesion and biofilm formation by oral <jats:italic>streptococci</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>staphylococci</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>Candida</jats:italic>. Post-processing and particularly glazing process significantly reduce bacterial biofilm formation and the risk of failure of final restoration.</jats:p></jats:sec>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • scanning electron microscopy
  • resin
  • size-exclusion chromatography
  • susceptibility
  • curing
  • polishing