Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Blekkenhorst, Lauren C.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 13
  • 2

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2024Co-design of a personalised digital intervention to improve vegetable intake in adults living in Australian rural communities2citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Zhang, Yuxin
1 / 3 shared
Mathers, John C.
1 / 1 shared
Godrich, Stephanie L.
1 / 1 shared
Barnett, Scott
1 / 2 shared
Bastian, Amber
1 / 1 shared
Partridge, Stephanie R.
1 / 1 shared
Mcnaughton, Sarah A.
1 / 1 shared
Dullaghan, Kate
1 / 1 shared
Hendrie, Gilly A.
1 / 1 shared
Maddison, Ralph
1 / 1 shared
Livingstone, Katherine Mary
1 / 1 shared
Alston, Laura
1 / 1 shared
Rawstorn, Jonathan C.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2024

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Zhang, Yuxin
  • Mathers, John C.
  • Godrich, Stephanie L.
  • Barnett, Scott
  • Bastian, Amber
  • Partridge, Stephanie R.
  • Mcnaughton, Sarah A.
  • Dullaghan, Kate
  • Hendrie, Gilly A.
  • Maddison, Ralph
  • Livingstone, Katherine Mary
  • Alston, Laura
  • Rawstorn, Jonathan C.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Co-design of a personalised digital intervention to improve vegetable intake in adults living in Australian rural communities

  • Zhang, Yuxin
  • Mathers, John C.
  • Godrich, Stephanie L.
  • Barnett, Scott
  • Bastian, Amber
  • Partridge, Stephanie R.
  • Mcnaughton, Sarah A.
  • Dullaghan, Kate
  • Blekkenhorst, Lauren C.
  • Hendrie, Gilly A.
  • Maddison, Ralph
  • Livingstone, Katherine Mary
  • Alston, Laura
  • Rawstorn, Jonathan C.
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>Diets low in vegetables are a main contributor to the health burden experienced by Australians living in rural communities. Given the ubiquity of smartphones and access to the Internet, digital interventions may offer an accessible delivery model for a dietary intervention in rural communities. However, no digital interventions to address low vegetable intake have been co-designed with adults living in rural areas. This paper describes the co-design of a digital intervention to improve vegetable intake with rural community members and research partners.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Active participants in the co-design process were adults ≥ 18 years living in three rural Australian communities (total <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 57) and research partners (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 4) representing three local rural governments and one peak non-government health organisation. An iterative co-design process was undertaken to understand the needs (pre-design phase) and ideas (generative phase) of the target population. Eight online workshops and a community survey were conducted between July and December 2021. The MoSCoW prioritisation method was used to help participants identify the ‘Must-have, Should-have, Could-have, and Won’t-have or will not have right now’ features and functions of the digital intervention. Workshops were transcribed and inductively analysed using NVivo. Convergent and divergent themes were identified between the workshops and community survey to identify how to implement the digital intervention in the community.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Consensus was reached on a concept for a digital intervention that addressed individual and food environment barriers to vegetable intake, specific to rural communities. Implementation recommendations centred on (i) food literacy approaches to improve skills via access to vegetable-rich recipes and healthy eating resources, (ii) access to personalisation options and behaviour change support, and (iii) improving the community food environment by providing information on and access to local food initiatives.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Rural-dwelling adults expressed preferences for personalised intervention features that can enhance food literacy and engagement with community food environments. This research will inform the development of the prototyping (evaluation phase) and feasibility testing (post-design phase) of this intervention.</jats:p></jats:sec>

Topics
  • phase
  • size-exclusion chromatography