• Mujuni, Dennis
• Nabadda, Susan
• Nsawotebba, Andrew
• Ademun, Patrick
• Musisi, Kenneth
• Kangave, Fredrick
• Joloba, Moses
• Ibanda, Ivan
• Nadunga, Diana
• Nsubuga, Richard
• Kabugo, Joel
• Adam, Isa
• Wekiya, Enock
• Nyombi, Abdunoor

Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>Smear microscopy has remained the initial diagnostic test for presumptive tuberculosis (TB) patients in health facilities without the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended rapid diagnostic tools. In the Uganda TB laboratory network, the technique remains the only tool to monitor response to treatment among drug susceptible TB patients, with the country currently having over 1,600 microscopy TB testing units. It has been evidenced that acid-fast bacilli (AFB) microscopy’s yield highly depends on the staining technique and reading ability of the laboratory personnel. For the quality of TB testing in the country, the TB control program set up a Randomized Blinded Rechecking (RBRC) program in 2008 to monitor the testing performance of laboratories to continuously improve the reliability and efficiency of results. This is the first study to determine the effectiveness and impact of the RBRC program on the performance of the participating laboratories in Uganda.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>This was a retrospective cross-sectional study based on a record review of the RBRC’s annual results compilations between January 2008 and December 2017.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Between January 2008 and December 2017, a total of 265,523 smears were re-checked during the RBRC program. The number of enrolled laboratories in the RBRC program rose from 660 to 2008 to 1,406 in 2017. The RBRC program resulted in a statistically significant reduction in microscopy errors, with false positives decreasing from 12.8% to 2008 to 7.6% in 2017, false positive errors decreasing from 10 to 6.3%, false negative errors decreasing from 2.9 to 0.7%, quantification errors decreasing from 6.0 to 1.8%, and the overall sensitivity of smear microscopy compared to the controllers increased with statistical significance from 93 to 97%.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>The study reveals an overall significant error reduction and an improved sensitivity of smear microscopy upon continuous implementation of the RBRC program in an AFB microscopy TB laboratory network. Implementation of a RBRC program is crucial and essential to maintaining a reliable TB laboratory service that can facilitate accurate diagnosis and offset the disadvantages of using smear microscopy.</jats:p></jats:sec>

Topics

• impedance spectroscopy
• size-exclusion chromatography
• microscopy