Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Lee, Hans C.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 15
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2023Single Cell Multi-Omic Analysis of Neoplastic Plasma Cells across the Disease Spectrum Identifies Novel Pathobiologic Mediators and Potential Therapeutic Targets in Multiple Myeloma (MM)citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Diao, Lixia
1 / 1 shared
Weber, Donna M.
1 / 1 shared
Song, Yang
1 / 5 shared
Orlowski, Robert Z.
1 / 1 shared
Symer, David E.
1 / 1 shared
Manasanch, Elisabet E.
1 / 1 shared
Jiang, Bo
1 / 4 shared
Thomas, Sheeba K.
1 / 1 shared
Wang, Jing
1 / 19 shared
Patel, Krina K.
1 / 1 shared
Vora, Amishi U.
1 / 1 shared
Akagi, Keiko
1 / 1 shared
Gillison, Maura L.
1 / 1 shared
Lin, Pei
1 / 1 shared
Rueda, Luz Yurany Moreno
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Diao, Lixia
  • Weber, Donna M.
  • Song, Yang
  • Orlowski, Robert Z.
  • Symer, David E.
  • Manasanch, Elisabet E.
  • Jiang, Bo
  • Thomas, Sheeba K.
  • Wang, Jing
  • Patel, Krina K.
  • Vora, Amishi U.
  • Akagi, Keiko
  • Gillison, Maura L.
  • Lin, Pei
  • Rueda, Luz Yurany Moreno
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Single Cell Multi-Omic Analysis of Neoplastic Plasma Cells across the Disease Spectrum Identifies Novel Pathobiologic Mediators and Potential Therapeutic Targets in Multiple Myeloma (MM)

  • Diao, Lixia
  • Weber, Donna M.
  • Song, Yang
  • Orlowski, Robert Z.
  • Symer, David E.
  • Manasanch, Elisabet E.
  • Jiang, Bo
  • Thomas, Sheeba K.
  • Wang, Jing
  • Patel, Krina K.
  • Lee, Hans C.
  • Vora, Amishi U.
  • Akagi, Keiko
  • Gillison, Maura L.
  • Lin, Pei
  • Rueda, Luz Yurany Moreno
Abstract

<jats:title/><jats:p>Background:</jats:p><jats:p>A challenge to developing a full understanding of MM pathobiology using bulk profiling techniques is the large degree of intra-tumoral heterogeneity from minor subclones that, despite their low representation, nonetheless contribute to therapy resistance and disease progression. Moreover, our current therapies tend to be targeted against pathways common to both neoplastic and normal plasma cells (PCs), indicating a need to define novel tumor biology modifiers that could potentially serve to improve risk stratification and as therapeutic targets.</jats:p><jats:p>Methods:</jats:p><jats:p>To overcome these limitations, we simultaneously evaluated individual PC single-cell transcriptome and B-cell receptor variable (VDJ) sequences from freshly enriched bone marrow biopsies. These included 33 patients with precursor conditions, 17 each with newly diagnosed symptomatic or relapsed/refractory disease (RRMM), and 3 controls using the 10x Genomics platform. A total of ~320,000 PCs were analyzed, yielding median per sample cell counts of 4,626 and ~300 million total reads. Identical immunoglobulin VDJ sequences defined monoclonal PCs, while diverse VDJ sequences at low frequencies defined polyclonal cells, allowing each patient to serve as their own control.</jats:p><jats:p>Results:</jats:p><jats:p>The percentage of monoclonal PCs in active MM was &amp;gt;84%, while precursor stages were more variable (40-100% in smoldering MM; 0.3-82% in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS)). Though we could not identify monoclonal PCs in two MGUS cases, we identified them by scRNA-seq in four MGUS patients whose bone marrow showed no clonal cells by standard clinical multiparametric flow cytometry.</jats:p><jats:p>In differential gene expression analysis where samples were grouped based on the diagnosis, 501 dysregulated genes were identified in monoclonal PCs from symptomatic MM compared to polyclonal PCs. These included genes previously identified as disease modifiers, including Hepatocyte growth factor, Lactate dehydrogenase A, Dickkopf WNT signaling pathway inhibitor 1, CD27, and Lysosomal associated membrane protein family member 5, providing validation for our approach. Next, we identified 279 genes that were commonly dysregulated in monoclonal PCs from symptomatic vs. asymptomatic MM. We also performed unsupervised hierarchical clustering of the top 1000 most variable genes and defined three diagnostic categories. Significant ontology terms characterizing these categories broadly involved antigen processing and recognition in Group 1 (enriched in precursor stages); transcription and translation control in Group 2 (enriched in active MM); and cell division and DNA metabolism in Group 3 (enriched with RRMM) ( A).</jats:p><jats:p>We focused on dysregulated targets that: showed differential expression in monoclonal vs. polyclonal PCs; expression in most patients within a diagnostic category; a correlation with outcomes in the CoMMpassstudy; and novelty in MM. Among these were Mitotic arrest deficient 2 like 1 (MAD2L1), a component of the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint, and Methionine adenosyltransferase 2A (MAT2A), which catalyzes the production of S-adenosylmethionine, a key methyl donor in multiple cellular processes, from methionine and ATP. Notably, MAD2L1 inhibition with M2I1, and MAT2A targeting with the allosteric inhibitor AG-270, both produced a dose- and time-dependent inhibition in cell proliferation and reduction in myeloma cell line viability. Importantly, the effects of AG-270 ( B) were associated with induction of markers of apoptosis, including Caspase cleavage, and a reduction of Histone H3 dimethylation. Moreover, they occurred at clinically relevant concentrations based on the known pharmacokinetics of this drug in Phase I testing.</jats:p><jats:p>Conclusions:</jats:p><jats:p>Our combined single-cell transcriptomics and VDJ sequencing allowed a greater understanding of heterogeneity among neoplastic PCs compared to each patient's own polyclonal PCs. These analyses can identify putative novel mediators of disease pathobiology that impact prognosis, and that can serve as potential new therapeutic targets using either novel agents, or drug repurposed from other therapeutic areas, setting the stage for their translation to the clinic.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • phase
  • refractory
  • clustering