Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Lee, Lydia Sarah Hui

  • Google
  • 2
  • 29
  • 4

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2023Development of a Phase 1 Study Evaluating the Activity of Modular CAR T for Multiple Myeloma (MCARTY) Targeting BCMA and CD19 for Improved Persistence4citations
  • 2023Spatial Mapping of Myeloma Bone Marrow Microenvironment Using a Deep Learning Approachcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Agliardi, Giulia
1 / 1 shared
Pereira, Vitoria
1 / 1 shared
Vaughan, Mhairi
1 / 1 shared
Parrish, Christopher
1 / 1 shared
Green, Louisa
1 / 1 shared
Popat, Rakesh
1 / 2 shared
Lewin, Evie
1 / 1 shared
Lim, Wen Chean
1 / 1 shared
Mactier, Catriona
1 / 1 shared
Pinto, Juliana Dias Alves
1 / 1 shared
Garcia, John
1 / 1 shared
Spanswick, Victoria
1 / 1 shared
Wilson, William
1 / 12 shared
Holmes, Helen
1 / 1 shared
Popova, Bilyana
1 / 1 shared
Wood, Leigh
1 / 1 shared
Pule, Martin A.
1 / 1 shared
Thomas, Simon
1 / 2 shared
Jannoo, Riaz
1 / 1 shared
Pathak, Yashma
1 / 1 shared
Yong, Kwee
2 / 2 shared
Roddie, Claire
1 / 1 shared
Hagos, Yeman Brhane
1 / 1 shared
Patel, Dominic
1 / 1 shared
Mikolajczak, Anna
1 / 1 shared
Lecat, Catherine Sy
1 / 1 shared
Rodriguez-Justo, Manuel
1 / 1 shared
Yuan, Yinyin
1 / 1 shared
Tran, Thien-An
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Agliardi, Giulia
  • Pereira, Vitoria
  • Vaughan, Mhairi
  • Parrish, Christopher
  • Green, Louisa
  • Popat, Rakesh
  • Lewin, Evie
  • Lim, Wen Chean
  • Mactier, Catriona
  • Pinto, Juliana Dias Alves
  • Garcia, John
  • Spanswick, Victoria
  • Wilson, William
  • Holmes, Helen
  • Popova, Bilyana
  • Wood, Leigh
  • Pule, Martin A.
  • Thomas, Simon
  • Jannoo, Riaz
  • Pathak, Yashma
  • Yong, Kwee
  • Roddie, Claire
  • Hagos, Yeman Brhane
  • Patel, Dominic
  • Mikolajczak, Anna
  • Lecat, Catherine Sy
  • Rodriguez-Justo, Manuel
  • Yuan, Yinyin
  • Tran, Thien-An
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Spatial Mapping of Myeloma Bone Marrow Microenvironment Using a Deep Learning Approach

  • Lee, Lydia Sarah Hui
  • Hagos, Yeman Brhane
  • Patel, Dominic
  • Mikolajczak, Anna
  • Lecat, Catherine Sy
  • Rodriguez-Justo, Manuel
  • Yuan, Yinyin
  • Tran, Thien-An
  • Yong, Kwee
Abstract

<jats:title /><jats:p>Background:</jats:p><jats:p>Interactions between multiple myeloma (MM) cells and the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment influence disease evolution and drug resistance. Information is largely based on BM aspirates, which lack topological information and can be affected by haemodilution. To examine the spatial relationships between tumour and immune cells in the MM immune tumour microenvironment (iTME), we used multiplex immunohistochemistry (MIHC) coupled with deep learning (DL) image analysis for detailed visualization and unbiased automated analysis of BM components.</jats:p><jats:p>Methods:</jats:p><jats:p>BM trephines from patients (at a single centre) with monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance (n=9, MGUS) and newly diagnosed MM (n=10, NDMM) with paired baseline and day100 post autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) were stained with MIHC panels (BLIMP-1 for tumour, CD4, CD8, FOXP3). To dissect the unique BM landscape, we developed a superpixel based DL model (MoSaicNet) to distinguish blood, bone, fat and cellular tissue. We then developed a cell abundance aware DL method for cell detection and classification (AwareNet) on whole slide images. To tackle cell abundance bias, AwareNet assigned higher attention scores to rare cell types during model training. We used an independent validation cohort consisting of 9 NDMM with paired baseline and post-treatment BM samples to further evaluate the model's performance (n=18). Validation cohort samples were obtained from 7 different hospitals and were stained using a different autostainer of the same model. A colour normalization step was added before analysis.</jats:p><jats:p>Results:</jats:p><jats:p>MoSaicNet and AwareNet enabled us to evaluate densities and spatial proximity between cell types. To train, validate and test MoSaicNet, 269 regions of interest (69884 superpixels) from 19 BM samples were annotated by pathologists. For AwareNet, 8004 single-cell annotations were made on 11 samples. MoSaicNet achieved an overall classification area under the curve (AUC) of 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.989, 0.991]. Similarly, AwareNet achieved a high overall AUC of 0.98 [0.977, 0.984]. AwareNet outperformed state of the art methods such as U-net and CONCORDe-Net in detecting both abundant and rare cell types. In addition, both algorithms achieved an overall AUC of &amp;gt;0.97 when applied to the validation cohort, despite different tissue processing and staining methods.</jats:p><jats:p>Densities of FOXP3+CD4+, FOXP3-CD4+ and CD8+ cells did not differ significantly between NDMM and MGUS samples (p=0.32, p=0.81 and p=0.74 respectively), however, there were fewer BLIMP1+ cells in proximity to CD8+ cells in MGUS samples compared with NDMM samples. In NDMM patients, post-treatment samples revealed a reduction in densities of BLIMP1+ cells (p=0.013), CD8+ T cells (p=0.004) and FOXP3+CD4+ regulatory T cells (p=0.004) when compared with baseline. The number of BLIMP1+ cells in proximity to CD8+ and CD4+ cells significantly reduced post-treatment (Corrected for densities, p&amp;lt;0.05), indicating changes in iTME. Analysis of the validation cohort provided similar density and spatial results.</jats:p><jats:p>Conclusion:</jats:p><jats:p>We describe the use of a DL pipeline for tissue segmentation and automated cell annotation, enabling spatial mapping of the MM iTME to address topographical questions related to immune function and cell-to-cell interactions. The high accuracy in the validation cohort suggests that our model could be applied to other independent datasets after a normalization step.</jats:p>

Topics
  • density
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • chemical ionisation