Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Ewing, Joanne

  • Google
  • 1
  • 18
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2021Correlation of Quality of Life between Treatment Outcomes in the Majic Study Which Compared Ruxolitinib to Best Available Therapy in Polycythemia Veracitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Mcmullin, Mary Frances
1 / 1 shared
Mesa, Ruben A.
1 / 1 shared
Godfrey, Anna L.
1 / 1 shared
Dueck, Amylou C.
1 / 1 shared
Knapper, Steve
1 / 1 shared
Drummond, Mark W.
1 / 1 shared
Coppell, Jason
1 / 1 shared
Jackson, Aimee
1 / 1 shared
Boucher, Rebecca H.
1 / 1 shared
Yap, Christina
1 / 1 shared
Harrison, Claire N.
1 / 2 shared
Geyer, Holly L.
1 / 1 shared
Scherber, Robyn
1 / 1 shared
Ailts, Isaak
1 / 1 shared
Mead-Harvey, Carolyn
1 / 1 shared
Mead, Adam J.
1 / 1 shared
Fox, Sonia
1 / 1 shared
Saha, Chandan
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2021

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Mcmullin, Mary Frances
  • Mesa, Ruben A.
  • Godfrey, Anna L.
  • Dueck, Amylou C.
  • Knapper, Steve
  • Drummond, Mark W.
  • Coppell, Jason
  • Jackson, Aimee
  • Boucher, Rebecca H.
  • Yap, Christina
  • Harrison, Claire N.
  • Geyer, Holly L.
  • Scherber, Robyn
  • Ailts, Isaak
  • Mead-Harvey, Carolyn
  • Mead, Adam J.
  • Fox, Sonia
  • Saha, Chandan
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Correlation of Quality of Life between Treatment Outcomes in the Majic Study Which Compared Ruxolitinib to Best Available Therapy in Polycythemia Vera

  • Mcmullin, Mary Frances
  • Mesa, Ruben A.
  • Godfrey, Anna L.
  • Dueck, Amylou C.
  • Knapper, Steve
  • Drummond, Mark W.
  • Coppell, Jason
  • Jackson, Aimee
  • Ewing, Joanne
  • Boucher, Rebecca H.
  • Yap, Christina
  • Harrison, Claire N.
  • Geyer, Holly L.
  • Scherber, Robyn
  • Ailts, Isaak
  • Mead-Harvey, Carolyn
  • Mead, Adam J.
  • Fox, Sonia
  • Saha, Chandan
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p /><jats:p>MAJIC is a phase II trial of Ruxolitinib (RUX) vs Best Available Therapy (BAT) in polycythemia vera (PV) patients with resistance/intolerance to Hydroxycarbamide (HC). This analysis involved a primary comparison between the RUX and BAT arms for quality of life (QOL) durability over 60 months, with secondary comparisons of best QOL response within first year in complete hematologic responders (CR) vs a group of partial or no response (NR/PR). This is a unique analysis due to cross-over nature of prior studies.</jats:p><jats:p>Patients were stratified by treatment arm with either RUX or BAT. QOL was assessed over 0-60 months using the Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF). MPN-SAF Total Symptom Score (TSS) was computed as the average of all completed items multiplied by 10 (scale 0-100, higher score represents higher symptom burden). Estimates of change from baseline and between arm differences in change by timepoint were made using a linear mixed model with compound symmetry covariance structure, which included covariates for categorical time point, treatment arm, and the interaction between time point and treatment arm. The difference between arms in proportion of patients with best post-baseline TSS response of 50% or greater was testing using a Chi-square test.</jats:p><jats:p>In this study, 147 of the 190 trial patients had started treatment and completed at least their baseline assessment and were included in the analysis with 39 patients completing through 60 months. Groups were comprised of 76 patients in the RUX group (31 females, 45 males, mean age 64.2 [SD 11.4]) and 71 patients in the BAT group (29 females, 42 males, mean age 64.6 [SD 11.5]). Symptom scores at baseline were similar between arms, with MPN-SAF weight loss the only statistically significant difference (BAT 0.7 [SD 1.71] vs RUX 1.7 [SD 2.83], p=0.02). Significant, durable improvements in TSS were noted in RUX patients with symptom improvements lasting a mean of 52 months. BAT patients experienced a worsening of their symptom burden with improvements back to baseline notable at 56 months (Figure 1). MPN-SAF TSS there were significant differences between treatment arms in change from baseline to months 2-32, 44, and 48 (all p&amp;lt;0.05). In all months the trend was in the direction of larger improvement in the RUX arm, with the point estimate for difference ranging from 2.1 (at month 56) to 11.3 (at month 4) with most prominent changes occurring between months 2 and 32. Of the 80 patients with MPN-SAF TSS scores at baseline and at least one post-baseline timepoint, 13/41 (31.7%) BAT and 24/39 (61.5%) RUX patients had TSS reduction of 50% or greater in at least one time point, which was statistically significant (p=0.008). In regard to specific symptoms, there was a statistically significant between arm difference seen in over 5 timepoints for fatigue, early satiety, night-sweats, itching, bone pain, and weight loss.</jats:p><jats:p>Comparing MPN-SAF TSS in Complete Response (CR n=51) vs Non-Responder/Partial Responders (NR/PR) (n=96) there was no difference at baseline in any of the measures at any time point. A possible limitation of this study is the potential for bias in which the patients who were lost to follow up could be different then the patients who remained in the study through all 60 months which would affect generalization, particularly at time points at the later years.</jats:p><jats:p>The novel findings of this investigation demonstrate that Ruxolitinib ameliorates the PV symptom burden in patients resistant or intolerant to HC in a robust durable manner over at least four years, while patients receiving BAT have worsening of their symptom burden over this same time period.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • compound
  • phase
  • fatigue
  • durability