| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Barnett, Stephanie Jayne
University of Portsmouth
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (19/19 displayed)
- 2024Life cycle assessment of steel fibre-reinforced concrete beamscitations
- 2019Behaviour of hybrid steel fibre reinforced self compacting concrete using innovative hooked-end steel fibres under tensile stresscitations
- 2017Effects of steel fibre-aggregate interaction on mechanical behaviour of steel fibre reinforced concretecitations
- 2016Investigating geometrical size effect on the flexural strength of the ultra high performance fibre reinforced concrete using the cohesive crack modelcitations
- 2016Distribution and orientation of steel fibres in steel fibre reinforced concrete
- 2016Factors influencing the compressive strength of fly ash based geopolymerscitations
- 2014Modelling behaviour of ultra high performance fibre reinforced concretecitations
- 2014Numerical simulation of ultra high performance fibre reinforced concrete panels subjected to blast loadingcitations
- 2013Maturity testing of lightweight self-compacting and vibrated concretescitations
- 2011Study of fibre orientation and distribution in UHPFRC by electrical resistivity and mechanical tests
- 2010Assessment of fibre orientation in ultra high performance fibre reinforced concrete and its effect on flexural strengthcitations
- 2008The effect of temperature on the rate of strength development of slag cement
- 2007Fast-track construction with slag cement concrete: adiabatic strength development and strength prediction
- 2007UHPFRC - Optimisation of mix proportions
- 2006Strength development of mortars containing ground granulated blast-furnace slag: effect of curing temperature and determination of apparent activation energiescitations
- 2003Extent of immiscibility in the ettringite-thaumasite systemcitations
- 2002Study of thaumasite and ettringite phases formed in sulfate/blast furnace slag slurries using XRD full pattern fittingcitations
- 2001An XRPD profile fitting investigation of the solid solution between ettringite, Ca6Al2(SO4)3(OH)12.26H2O, and carbonate ettringite, Ca6Al2(CO3)3(OH)12.26H2Ocitations
- 2000Solid solutions between ettringite, Ca6Al2(SO4)3(OH)12.26H2O, and thaumasite, Ca3SiSO4CO3(OH)6.12H2Ocitations
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
Modelling behaviour of ultra high performance fibre reinforced concrete
Abstract
The Cohesive Crack Model (CCM) is the most commonly accepted discrete crack approach for modelling concrete based materials. It is applied to Ultra High Performance Fibre Reinforced Concrete (UHPFRC) in this study because it can be easily represented as cohesive interface elements (CIE) in finite element modelling (FEM). CCM using a bilinear traction-separation relationship is used to simulate the load-deflection behaviour of UHPFRC test specimens. CCM based numerical simulation of three-point bend specimens are implemented using cohesive elements in ABAQUS FE software. Progressive crack propagation and failure mechanism of UHPFRC test specimens are simulated in order to predict their load capacities. Comparison of the simulation to existing experimental test results indicates that CCM with a bilinear traction-separation curve can provide predictions of both the loaddeflection curves and peak load of 100 and 150mm deep UHPFRC test specimens to =/- 6 % of the average for 50 and 100mm wide beams and to =/+20% for 150mm wide beams. Model predictions of the peak load for the 50mm wide and 50mm deep beams were to =/-25% of the average.