Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Howell, Sacha

  • Google
  • 1
  • 9
  • 7

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2018Estrogenicity of essential oils is not required to relieve symptoms of urogenital atrophy in breast cancer survivors7citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Kohler, Bertram
1 / 1 shared
Clarke, Robert
1 / 5 shared
Stringer, Jacqui
1 / 1 shared
Richardson, Riina
1 / 3 shared
Armstrong, Anne
1 / 2 shared
Bruno, M. Simões
1 / 1 shared
Young, Keely
1 / 1 shared
Novak Frazer, Lilyann
1 / 2 shared
Zucchini, Giorgia
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2018

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Kohler, Bertram
  • Clarke, Robert
  • Stringer, Jacqui
  • Richardson, Riina
  • Armstrong, Anne
  • Bruno, M. Simões
  • Young, Keely
  • Novak Frazer, Lilyann
  • Zucchini, Giorgia
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Estrogenicity of essential oils is not required to relieve symptoms of urogenital atrophy in breast cancer survivors

  • Kohler, Bertram
  • Clarke, Robert
  • Stringer, Jacqui
  • Richardson, Riina
  • Armstrong, Anne
  • Bruno, M. Simões
  • Young, Keely
  • Novak Frazer, Lilyann
  • Zucchini, Giorgia
  • Howell, Sacha
Abstract

Background: Urogenital atrophy (UA) is a common treatment-limiting side effect of endocrine therapies. Topical estrogen is effective but systemic absorption may counter aromatase inhibitor efficacy. Numerous complementary approaches are marketed for use in UA without rigorous testing of their estrogenicity. Wetested multiple essential oils in cancer cell growth and estrogen reporter assays in vitro and assessed clinical outcomes with the essential oil pessaries (EOP) in breast cancer survivors with UA.<br/>Methods: Effects on cell growth were tested in hormone dependent (MCF-7) and independent (MDA-MB-231) cell lines using the sulforhodamine-B assay. An estrogenic response element (ERE) luciferase reporter assay was used to assess estrogenicity directly. Antifungal activity against two common pathogenic yeasts was assessed using standard microdilution methods. EOPs were offered to breast cancer survivors with symptomatic UA and the service evaluated using serial questionnaires.<br/>Results: Two essential oils, Cymbopogon martinii and Pelargonium graveolens, demonstrated marked estrogenicity, stimulating ER+ cell growth and ERE-luciferase reporter activity to levels seen with premenopausal estradiol concentrations. Additional oils were screened for estrogenicity and Lavandula angustifolia and Chamaemelum nobile identified as non/minimally estrogenic. The antifungal activity of this combination of oils was confirmed. A second cohort of breast cancer survivors with UA received the second generation EOP with comparable improvement in symptom scores suggesting that estrogenicity may not be required for optimal therapy of UA. <br/>Conclusion: Certain essential oils demonstrate profound estrogenicity and caution should be exercised before their use in breast cancer survivors. Our minimally estrogenic pessary will be formally tested in clinical trials.<br/>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy