Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Salem, Karrar Hazim

  • Google
  • 4
  • 22
  • 21

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (4/4 displayed)

  • 2023Biosynthesis of Au–CuO–ZnO Nanocomposite using leaf extract and activity as anti- bacterial, anti-cancer, degradation of CB dye4citations
  • 2023Studying the Optical and Structural Properties and Anticancer Activity of New PVA–Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>:Cu Nanocomposite Materials2citations
  • 2023Designing PMMA–PVA–TiO<sub>2</sub> as New Hybrid Nanocomposite for Anticancer Applications2citations
  • 2023Investigation on the impact of elevated temperature on sustainable geopolymer composite13citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Elayaperumal, Manikandan
1 / 1 shared
Ameen, Noha Inam
1 / 2 shared
Zabibah, Rahman S.
3 / 5 shared
Alkhafaji, Mohammed Ayad
2 / 2 shared
Saxena, Kuldeep K.
2 / 7 shared
Ali, Luma Hakim
1 / 1 shared
Muslim, Wisam Aqeel
1 / 1 shared
Mohammed, Kahtan A.
3 / 10 shared
Ghali, Azhar Abees
1 / 1 shared
Mohammed, Jalal Hasan
1 / 1 shared
Kareem, Ahmed Shayaa
2 / 2 shared
Jarad, Amer N.
1 / 1 shared
Talib, Rawnaq A.
1 / 1 shared
Khmees, Entidar Jasim
2 / 2 shared
Al-Tememe, E. H.
1 / 1 shared
Hasan, Nuha Hadi Jasim Al
1 / 1 shared
Salmaan, Ummal
1 / 1 shared
Gupta, Nakul
1 / 4 shared
Meena, Rahul Kumar
1 / 1 shared
Singh, Indrajeet
1 / 2 shared
Reddy, M. Madhusudhan
1 / 1 shared
Verma, Manvendra
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Elayaperumal, Manikandan
  • Ameen, Noha Inam
  • Zabibah, Rahman S.
  • Alkhafaji, Mohammed Ayad
  • Saxena, Kuldeep K.
  • Ali, Luma Hakim
  • Muslim, Wisam Aqeel
  • Mohammed, Kahtan A.
  • Ghali, Azhar Abees
  • Mohammed, Jalal Hasan
  • Kareem, Ahmed Shayaa
  • Jarad, Amer N.
  • Talib, Rawnaq A.
  • Khmees, Entidar Jasim
  • Al-Tememe, E. H.
  • Hasan, Nuha Hadi Jasim Al
  • Salmaan, Ummal
  • Gupta, Nakul
  • Meena, Rahul Kumar
  • Singh, Indrajeet
  • Reddy, M. Madhusudhan
  • Verma, Manvendra
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Investigation on the impact of elevated temperature on sustainable geopolymer composite

  • Salmaan, Ummal
  • Salem, Karrar Hazim
  • Gupta, Nakul
  • Meena, Rahul Kumar
  • Singh, Indrajeet
  • Reddy, M. Madhusudhan
  • Verma, Manvendra
Abstract

<jats:p> Geopolymer concrete (GPC) is an eco-friendly, sustainable, cementless and green concrete. It could be an alternative to the conventional concrete. In alkaline circumstances, the alumina and silica concentration in geopolymer concrete creates the geopolymer bond, while regular concrete creates C-S-H (calcium silicate hydrate bond). The final result of the geopolymer bond does not include any water. At elevated temperatures, geopolymer concrete would thus be more stable. Due to its greater strength and durability quality, geopolymer concrete may be the ideal replacement for ordinary portland cement (OPC) concrete. This research intends to examine how specimens of geopolymer concrete and regular concrete respond to exposure to increased temperatures between 100°C and 800°C. Mass loss, ultrasonic pulse velocity, compressive strength, X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis and derivative thermogravimetric analysis were all examined throughout the experimental examination. Both concrete specimens lose mass or weight as the exposure temperature rises; OPC concrete samples spalls at 600°C, while GPC sample fail at 800°C. GPC specimens lose around 12% of their original mass after being exposed to temperatures of 800°C, while OPC specimens lose about 7%. The GPC specimens maintained 60% of their initial compressive strength after being exposed to a temperature of 700°C, but the OPC concrete specimens only kept 52%. With each increase in exposure to extreme temperatures, the peaks of quartz and cristobalite are lowered. Only the form or structure of the mineral oxide would change; the chemical linkages would remain. The GPC samples subjected to temperatures of 100°C exhibit effective thermal stability than all other specimens exposed to extreme temperatures. As the exposure temperature rises, the GPC specimens become more thermally stable. According to the experimental findings, the GPC specimens’ bonding structure makes them more resistant to high temperatures than regular concrete specimens. Micropores are present in the voids of the geopolymer matrix, while mesopores and micropores are present in the voids of the OPC matrix. While OPC bonding is C-S-H formed by the hydration of lime and silica contained in the cement, the geopolymer bonding did not include the water content in the final or end result of geopolymerisation for strengthening. </jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • mineral
  • x-ray diffraction
  • strength
  • composite
  • cement
  • thermogravimetry
  • ultrasonic
  • void
  • Calcium
  • durability
  • lime