| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
De Munck, Jan
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (28/28 displayed)
- 2017Biofilm-induced changes to the composite surfacecitations
- 2017Residual compressive surface stress increases the bending strength of dental zirconiacitations
- 2016Influence of Light Irradiation Through Zirconia on the Degree of Conversion of Composite Cementscitations
- 2016Short fibre-reinforced composite for extensive direct restorations: a laboratory and computational assessment
- 2016Bonding Effectiveness of Luting Composites to Different CAD/CAM Materialscitations
- 2015Aging resistance of surface-treated dental zirconiacitations
- 2015Bonding Effectiveness to Differently Sandblasted Dental Zirconiacitations
- 2014Influence of sintering conditions on low-temperature degradation of dental zirconiacitations
- 2013Fracture toughness versus micro-tensile bond strength testing of adhesive-dentin interfaces.citations
- 2011Bonding effectiveness of luting composites to zirconia ceramics
- 2010Surface Roughness of Two Composites After Etching with Various Acids
- 2007Microrotary fatigue resistance of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive bonded to dentin
- 2007Effects of ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength of an adhesive luting agent to CAD-CAM ceramic
- 2007Microrotary fatigue resistance of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive bonded to dentin.
- 2006NaOCl degradation of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive bonded to enamel and dentin following two air-blowing techniques.citations
- 2006Bond strength of a mild self-etch adhesive with and without prior acid-etching
- 2005Effect of fracture strength of primer-adhesive mixture on bonding effectiveness
- 2005A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results
- 2005Micro-rotary Fatigue Resistance of a HEMA-free One-step Adhesive
- 2005Micro-tensile bond strength of adhesives bonded to Class-I cavity-bottom dentin after thermo-cycling.citations
- 2005A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results.citations
- 2005Micro-tensile bond strength of adhesives bonded to class-I cavity-bottom dentin after thermo-cycling
- 2005Fatigue resistance of dentin/composite interfaces with an additional intermediate elastic layer
- 2005Fatigue resistance of dentin/composite interfaces with an additional intermediate elastic layer.citations
- 2004Fatigue resistance of dentin/composite interfaces with an additional shock-absorbing layer
- 2004Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin.citations
- 2003Microtensile bond strengths of an etch&rinse and self-etch adhesive to enamel and dentin as a function of surface treatment
- 2002Micro-tensile bond strength of two adhesives to Erbium:YAG-lased vs. bur-cut enamel and dentin.citations
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results.
Abstract
The immediate bonding effectiveness of contemporary adhesives is quite favorable, regardless of the approach used. In the long term, the bonding effectiveness of some adhesives drops dramatically, whereas the bond strengths of other adhesives are more stable. This review examines the fundamental processes that cause the adhesion of biomaterials to enamel and dentin to degrade with time. Non-carious class V clinical trials remain the ultimate test method for the assessment of bonding effectiveness, but in addition to being high-cost, they are time- and labor-consuming, and they provide little information on the true cause of clinical failure. Therefore, several laboratory protocols were developed to predict bond durability. This paper critically appraises methodologies that focus on chemical degradation patterns of hydrolysis and elution of interface components, as well as mechanically oriented test set-ups, such as fatigue and fracture toughness measurements. A correlation of in vitro and in vivo data revealed that, currently, the most validated method to assess adhesion durability involves aging of micro-specimens of biomaterials bonded to either enamel or dentin. After about 3 months, all classes of adhesives exhibited mechanical and morphological evidence of degradation that resembles in vivo aging effects. A comparison of contemporary adhesives revealed that the three-step etch-and-rinse adhesives remain the 'gold standard' in terms of durability. Any kind of simplification in the clinical application procedure results in loss of bonding effectiveness. Only the two-step self-etch adhesives approach the gold standard and do have some additional clinical benefits.