| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Reis, Ana
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (15/15 displayed)
- 2023Low- and High-Pressure Casting Aluminum Alloys: A Reviewcitations
- 2023Upcycling Aluminium Chips to Powder Feedstocks for Powder Metallurgy Applicationscitations
- 2023Additively Manufactured High-Strength Aluminum Alloys: A Reviewcitations
- 2022Damage Evolution Simulations via a Coupled Crystal Plasticity and Cohesive Zone Model for Additively Manufactured Austenitic SS 316L DED Componentscitations
- 2022Tensile Properties of As-Built 18Ni300 Maraging Steel Produced by DEDcitations
- 2022Numerical predictions of orthogonal cutting–induced residual stress of super alloy Inconel 718 considering dynamic recrystallizationcitations
- 2022An Adaptive Thermal Finite Element Simulation of Direct Energy Deposition With Reinforcement Learning: A Conceptual Frameworkcitations
- 2021Fracture Prediction Based on Evaluation of Initial Porosity Induced By Direct Energy Depositioncitations
- 2021Comparison of the machinability of the 316L and 18Ni300 additively manufactured steels based on turning testscitations
- 2021Numerical-experimental plastic-damage characterisation of additively manufactured 18ni300 maraging steel by means of multiaxial double-notched specimenscitations
- 2021Optimization of Direct Laser Deposition of a Martensitic Steel Powder (Metco 42C) on 42CrMo4 Steelcitations
- 2021An innovation in finite element simulation via crystal plasticity assessment of grain morphology effect on sheet metal formabilitycitations
- 2021Inconel 625/AISI 413 Stainless Steel Functionally Graded Material Produced by Direct Laser Depositioncitations
- 2021Deposition of Nickel-Based Superalloy Claddings on Low Alloy Structural Steel by Direct Laser Depositioncitations
- 2018Characterizing fracture forming limit and shear fracture forming limit for sheet metalscitations
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
Comparison of the machinability of the 316L and 18Ni300 additively manufactured steels based on turning tests
Abstract
<jats:p> This paper focuses on the machinability of additively manufactured steel alloys (316L stainless steel and 18Ni300 Maraging steel) by reference to their conventional metallurgical conditions. The machinability of both metallurgical conditions has been evaluated by longitudinal turning tests under laboratory conditions using two different cutting tool geometries (flat rake face and chip-breaker geometry) and covering different cutting speeds, depths of cut and feed values. Cutting forces, chip morphology and surface roughness were investigated as machinability indicators. The influence of chip-breaker on process performance was also analysed. For a comprehensive discussion of the results, microstructure, chemical composition, surface roughness and mechanical strength of both metallurgical conditions were studied. The paper quantitatively demonstrates that despite the higher mechanical strength of additively manufactured alloys, no significant power requirements were verified for the finishing cutting of tested alloys, when compared with conventional materials. Also noteworthy, is the surface quality improvement of the printed samples due to the most favourable conditions for chip formation. The usage of a chip breaker insert had higher impact on reducing required cutting energy than on controlling chip geometry. </jats:p>