Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Thomson, Peter

  • Google
  • 1
  • 2
  • 2

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2015Prediction of springback in anisotropic sheet metals: The effect of orientation and friction2citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Chen, Zhiping
1 / 1 shared
Nguyen, Vu
1 / 16 shared
Chart of publication period
2015

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Chen, Zhiping
  • Nguyen, Vu
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Prediction of springback in anisotropic sheet metals: The effect of orientation and friction

  • Chen, Zhiping
  • Thomson, Peter
  • Nguyen, Vu
Abstract

In this paper, springback of anisotropic sheet based on the modified form of the asymmetric non-quadratic yield function (YLD96) for plane stress conditions due to Barlat et al. (Yield function development for aluminium alloy sheets. J Mech Phys Solids 1997; 45: 1727–1763), suitable for describing mixed (isotropic and kinematic) hardening in aluminium alloy sheets under the Bauschinger Effect was compared with the results of tests. Simulation of uniaxial tensile and cyclic tests including both nonlinear isotropic and nonlinear kinematic hardening showed the necessity of including the Bauschinger effect in the constitutive equations at both small and large strains. Following the application to prediction of springback in draw bending of these alloys oriented in the rolling direction, draw-bending tests on AA2024-O and AA7075-O alloy sheets are described. The springback parameters of specimens with axes oriented at 45° and 90° to the rolling direction were measured and compared with prediction based on the modified form of the YLD96, which captured the hardening response at small and large strains when combined with the mixed hardening model, predicting springback in very good agreement with experimental results. The number of components of back stress used in this model depends on the nature of the nonlinear behaviour of the material. For alloys AA2024-O and AA7075-O, excellent agreement with experiments required the use of up to three nonlinear components of back stress. Prediction suggested values of friction consistent with published values and showed that friction inversely affected the radius of sidewall curl, but was not sensitive to lower and upper opening angle. This was consistent with the findings of Carden et al. (Measurement of springback. Int J Mech Sci 2002; 44: 79–101), although those authors also reported that very low friction may increase springback in their proposed draw-bending test. The results confirmed the efficacy of the yield surface model based on YLD96, modified to include nonlinear isotropic and nonlinear kinematic hardening, for predicting deformation subject to the Bauschinger effect.

Topics
  • surface
  • experiment
  • simulation
  • aluminium
  • anisotropic
  • aluminium alloy
  • bending flexural test
  • isotropic