People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Jovanova, Jovana
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (7/7 displayed)
- 2024Magnetic Stimulation for Programmed Shape Morphingcitations
- 2024Correlation between microstructural inhomogeneity and architectural design in additively manufactured NiTi shape memory alloyscitations
- 2023Superelastic response and damping behavior of additively manufactured Nitinol architectured materialscitations
- 2022Conceptual design of foldable truck trailercitations
- 2021Shape memory modeling of a nonlinear and superelastic compliant mechanismcitations
- 2019Target shape optimization of functionally graded shape memory alloy compliant mechanismscitations
- 2019Target Shape Optimization of 3D Compliant Mechanism With Superelastic Joints and Shape Memory Actuation
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Target shape optimization of functionally graded shape memory alloy compliant mechanisms
Abstract
<jats:p> This article focuses on the design optimization of shape memory alloy compliant mechanisms with functionally graded properties to achieve a user-defined target shape. The functional grading is approximated by allowing the geometry and the modulus of elasticity of each zone to vary. The superelastic phenomenon has been taken into account using a standard nonlinear shape memory alloy material model with linear region of higher modulus of elasticity and a superelastic region with much lower modulus of elasticity. A large deflection beam model is integrated with a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for constrained optimization of the structure’s mechanical properties and geometry. Examples illustrate the trade-offs between the objectives of minimizing shape error, maximum stress, and volume. It is observed that in the optimized designs, the elastic modulus and the geometry work together in regions where large flexibility is required to achieve the target shape. </jats:p>