Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Dhinakran, V.

  • Google
  • 6
  • 19
  • 67

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (6/6 displayed)

  • 2024A NOVEL DOUBLE-SIDE LASER WELDED THICK PLATE: MICROSTRUCTURE AND NUMERICAL PREDICTION OF TENSILE TESTcitations
  • 2023Manufacturing of multi material wall via fused filament fabrication: An insight characteristics5citations
  • 2023Prediction of static failure in metal inert gas welded nuclear grade pipe 347 SS: Experimentation and finite-element analysis approach1citations
  • 2022Effect of printing characteristics for the incorporation of hexagonal-shaped lattice structure on the PLA polymeric material44citations
  • 2022Influence of Nanosilica Particle Addition on Mechanical and Water Retention Properties of Natural Flax- and Sisal-Based Hybrid Nanocomposites under NaOH Conditions10citations
  • 2022Process optimization of compressive property and dimensional error on wood polylactic acid gyroid-structured polymer composite7citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Subramaniyan, Mohan Kumar
3 / 6 shared
Vellaisamy, Murugan
1 / 1 shared
Sarankumar, T.
1 / 1 shared
Browne, Micheal Agnelo
3 / 5 shared
Vellaisamy, M.
1 / 1 shared
Patil, B. P.
1 / 1 shared
Guo, Lei
1 / 5 shared
Yang, Chunhui
1 / 3 shared
Palaniyappan, Sabarinathan
2 / 4 shared
Natrayan, L.
1 / 27 shared
Kumar, S. Narain
1 / 1 shared
Surendhar, G. J.
1 / 1 shared
Sethupathy, S. Baskara
1 / 3 shared
Mekonnen, Hulusew Ferede
1 / 1 shared
Patil, Pravin P.
1 / 30 shared
Velmurugan, G.
1 / 10 shared
Sekar, S.
1 / 15 shared
Shanmugam, Ragavanantham
1 / 2 shared
Surendhar, Gj
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2023
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Subramaniyan, Mohan Kumar
  • Vellaisamy, Murugan
  • Sarankumar, T.
  • Browne, Micheal Agnelo
  • Vellaisamy, M.
  • Patil, B. P.
  • Guo, Lei
  • Yang, Chunhui
  • Palaniyappan, Sabarinathan
  • Natrayan, L.
  • Kumar, S. Narain
  • Surendhar, G. J.
  • Sethupathy, S. Baskara
  • Mekonnen, Hulusew Ferede
  • Patil, Pravin P.
  • Velmurugan, G.
  • Sekar, S.
  • Shanmugam, Ragavanantham
  • Surendhar, Gj
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Prediction of static failure in metal inert gas welded nuclear grade pipe 347 SS: Experimentation and finite-element analysis approach

  • Guo, Lei
  • Subramaniyan, Mohan Kumar
  • Yang, Chunhui
  • Browne, Micheal Agnelo
  • Dhinakran, V.
Abstract

<jats:p> Defect repair, one of primary concerns in the maintenance system for pipelines and other high strength components, is crucial in improving the reliability and economic benefits. Even though modern industries use several welding techniques to join metals, metal inert gas (MIG) welding is frequently preferred to weld stainless steel components by producing strong joints at high speed. In this study, MIG welding was used to butt weld 347 SS pipes. Research related to material failure is critical to engineers in order to find suitable application. Tensile test provides the static behavior of material. Therefore, predicting the strength and failure of material helps in satisfying industrial needs. Finite-element analysis (FEA) is an efficient technique to predict physical phenomenon virtually, therefore reducing the need for real-time prototypes. Johnson-Cook (J-C) material failure model is utilized to define failure in FEA model. Error percentage obtained while comparing FEA and experimental results of weld metal is 1.03%. Presence of niobium carbide is evident through the line map of energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy spectrum which prevents knife line attack through retarding chromium carbide precipitation at high temperature cycles. Welded samples with tensile strength of 583 ± 3 MPa exhibit better mechanical strength than base metal with tensile strength of 575 ± 2.5 MPa. This change in mechanical properties is caused by microstructural variation led by occurrence of constitutional supercooling while melt-pool solidifies. Failure mechanism of ductile fracture is understood from fractography (Tensile sample). Hence, this study provides a complete knowledge on failure mechanism of MIG-welded nuclear grade steel pipe under static loading. The failure mechanisms are explained in terms of FEA (J-C model) and fractography. </jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • stainless steel
  • chromium
  • melt
  • strength
  • carbide
  • defect
  • precipitation
  • Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy
  • tensile strength
  • finite element analysis
  • fractography
  • niobium