Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Silva, Ndd

  • Google
  • 1
  • 4
  • 11

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2020Experimental and numerical study of the dynamic response of an adhesively bonded automotive structure11citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Da Silva, Lfm
1 / 36 shared
Moreira, Pmgp
1 / 19 shared
Machado, Jjm
1 / 19 shared
Marques, Eas
1 / 26 shared
Chart of publication period
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Da Silva, Lfm
  • Moreira, Pmgp
  • Machado, Jjm
  • Marques, Eas
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Experimental and numerical study of the dynamic response of an adhesively bonded automotive structure

  • Da Silva, Lfm
  • Moreira, Pmgp
  • Machado, Jjm
  • Silva, Ndd
  • Marques, Eas
Abstract

Based on economic and environmental factors related to energy efficiency, the automotive industry is being increasingly encouraged to design lighter structures, making use of adhesive bonding in vehicle body frames. To meet the standards of the automotive sector, adhesive joints must provide high strength and stiffness, low cost and good energy absorption at a component level, thereby ensuring good impact strength and passenger safety. This work aims to study, at room temperature (24 degrees C), the impact response of a real scale automotive structure bonded with a crash-resistant epoxy, allowing to access the suitability of adhesives for automotive structural purposes. The epoxy adhesive was found to successfully transfer the loads to the aluminium substrates and not to compromise the integrity of the structure, as its failure was dominated by the behaviour of aluminium. Results obtained with a numerical model of the component were found to be in close agreement with the experimental failure load, demonstrating that numerical analysis can be a viable tool to predict the structure's behaviour. In addition, a polyurethane was used as an alternative to the epoxy system to bond the structure, proving that the joint behaves better in the presence of a more flexible adhesive, as no failure was found for this case. Aluminium single-lap joints with two adhesive thicknesses were tested as a complement to understand the influence of this parameter on the impact response of a joint, showing a 21% decrease in strength when the highest thickness was used.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • aluminium
  • strength
  • impact response