Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Wakuta, Yuma

  • Google
  • 1
  • 3
  • 1

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2023Evaluation of flow stress in nylon 66 via digital image correlation method and response surface method1citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Kitamura, Shigeaki
1 / 1 shared
Nishida, Masahiro
1 / 4 shared
Tsuda, Toru
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Kitamura, Shigeaki
  • Nishida, Masahiro
  • Tsuda, Toru
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Evaluation of flow stress in nylon 66 via digital image correlation method and response surface method

  • Kitamura, Shigeaki
  • Nishida, Masahiro
  • Tsuda, Toru
  • Wakuta, Yuma
Abstract

<jats:p> Nylon 66 is an engineering plastic with the advantageous characteristics of light weight, heat resistance, high strength, and high rigidity; it has been used in automobile parts as a substitute for aluminum alloys. There have also been many studies on the mechanical properties of nylon 66. However, the flow stress in nylon 66 after necking has not been thoroughly investigated yet due to the difficulty in identifying local stress. In this study, a flow stress optimization method based on the digital image correlation (DIC) method and response surface method, is proposed. The averaged true stress–true plastic strain curve is first obtained by a quasi-static tensile test via DIC. Subsequently, the flow stress is optimized via the response surface method to obtain the actual flow stress state after necking. The accurate flow stress in the specimen can be obtained based on the relationship between the global load force and distance between the two shoulders of the specimen grip parts that is unaffected by the cross-sectional area change during necking. The results indicate that the average true stress recorded from the experiment overestimates the flow stress after necking. The optimized flow stress exhibits the maximum decrease of 9%. The accuracy of the optimized flow stress is evaluated by comparison with the true strain distribution on the specimen that is accurately measured via DIC. </jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • polymer
  • experiment
  • aluminium
  • strength
  • heat resistance