Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Swanson, Philip

  • Google
  • 3
  • 13
  • 104

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2020On restructuring the microstructure of Ti-6Al-7Nb alloy before surface engineering5citations
  • 2019Altering the wetting properties of orthopaedic titanium alloy (Ti–6Al–7Nb) using laser shock peening33citations
  • 2014Laser Shock Peening and Mechanical Shot Peening Processes Applicable for the Surface Treatment of Technical Grade Ceramics66citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Shukla, Pratik
3 / 32 shared
Lawrence, Jonathan
2 / 92 shared
Shen, Xiaojun
2 / 7 shared
Zammit, Ann
1 / 4 shared
Jiao, Yang
1 / 1 shared
Sharma, Deepak
1 / 3 shared
Mee, Christopher
1 / 1 shared
Nakhodchi, Soheil
1 / 2 shared
Prabhakaran, S.
1 / 7 shared
Nie, Xiangfan
1 / 1 shared
Waugh, David
1 / 8 shared
An, Zhibin
1 / 1 shared
Page, Colin
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2020
2019
2014

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Shukla, Pratik
  • Lawrence, Jonathan
  • Shen, Xiaojun
  • Zammit, Ann
  • Jiao, Yang
  • Sharma, Deepak
  • Mee, Christopher
  • Nakhodchi, Soheil
  • Prabhakaran, S.
  • Nie, Xiangfan
  • Waugh, David
  • An, Zhibin
  • Page, Colin
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Laser Shock Peening and Mechanical Shot Peening Processes Applicable for the Surface Treatment of Technical Grade Ceramics

  • Shukla, Pratik
  • Page, Colin
  • Swanson, Philip
Abstract

Laser shock peening and conventional mechanical shot peening are both comparable processes generally applicable to surface treat various metals and alloys. Commercial advantages offered by the laser systems such as flexibility, deep penetration of laser-induced shocks with precise control of the thermal pulses, shorter process times, high speeds, accuracy and aesthetics are attractive in comparison with the mechanical shot peening technique. Laser shock peening in the recent years has proved to be successful with steels, aluminium and titanium surfaces and metallic alloys in general. Nevertheless, minimal research has been conducted on laser shock peening and mechanical shot peening of technical grade ceramics. This article presents an update of the theory and to-date relevant literature within the two subject areas, as well as a comparison and a contrast between the mechanical and laser shock peening techniques. In addition, various gaps in knowledge are identified to propose further research for the development of both the techniques applicable to the surface treatment of technical grade ceramics.

Topics
  • surface
  • theory
  • aluminium
  • steel
  • titanium
  • ceramic