Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Emami, Mohammad

  • Google
  • 1
  • 3
  • 1

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2024Analysis of single-point warm incremental forming for glass fiber-reinforced polyamide 6 sheets: Experimentation and simulation1citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Kalaei, Seyed Milad Mirnia
1 / 1 shared
Biglari, Farid Reza
1 / 1 shared
Razbin, Milad
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2024

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Kalaei, Seyed Milad Mirnia
  • Biglari, Farid Reza
  • Razbin, Milad
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Analysis of single-point warm incremental forming for glass fiber-reinforced polyamide 6 sheets: Experimentation and simulation

  • Emami, Mohammad
  • Kalaei, Seyed Milad Mirnia
  • Biglari, Farid Reza
  • Razbin, Milad
Abstract

<jats:p> The single-point warm incremental forming (SPWIF) methodology significantly enhances the formability of composite materials, enabling precise and efficient shaping of complex geometries. This research investigates the impact of several design parameters such as fiber weight fraction (0%, 20%, 30% by weight), process temperature (80°C, 120°C, 180°C), step size (0.25 mm, 0.50 mm, 0.75 mm), and fiber orientation (0°, 22.5°, 45°) on the formability of glass fiber-reinforced polyamide six sheets. Employing the Taguchi design of experiments methodology, a systematic study was undertaken. The sample with a 20% fiber weight fraction, 80°C process temperature, 0.50 mm step size, and 0° fiber orientation showed the greatest forming depth at 5.5 mm. Additionally, the study highlighted the predominant influence of fiber weight fraction on forming depth, attributing a significant contribution percentage of 58.75% to forming depth. Moreover, a numerical analysis, encompassing the homogenization of the composite sheet and simulation of the SPWIF process, was conducted. The findings revealed a consistent trend for both experimental and numerical results. For depth analysis, the thickness distribution was simulated, aligning with the observed experimental trends. This demonstrates the reliability of the numerical results. This research not only provides a detailed analysis of the SPWIF process in shaping composite sheets but also serves as a valuable resource for scholars engaging in numerical analyses within this domain. </jats:p>

Topics
  • experiment
  • simulation
  • glass
  • glass
  • composite
  • forming
  • homogenization