Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Ali, Aaqib

  • Google
  • 2
  • 5
  • 64

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2021Impact Toughness of Hybrid Carbon Fiber-PLA/ABS Laminar Composite Produced through Fused Filament Fabrication21citations
  • 2021An experimental study on interfacial fracture toughness of 3-D printed ABS/CF-PLA composite under mode I, II, and mixed-mode loading43citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Ahmed, Hafiz
1 / 2 shared
Hussain, Ghulam
2 / 19 shared
Gohar, Sohail
1 / 1 shared
Ilyas, Muhammad
1 / 8 shared
Khan, Abdul Samad
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2021

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Ahmed, Hafiz
  • Hussain, Ghulam
  • Gohar, Sohail
  • Ilyas, Muhammad
  • Khan, Abdul Samad
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

An experimental study on interfacial fracture toughness of 3-D printed ABS/CF-PLA composite under mode I, II, and mixed-mode loading

  • Hussain, Ghulam
  • Ilyas, Muhammad
  • Ali, Aaqib
  • Khan, Abdul Samad
Abstract

<jats:p> Multimaterial structures made using fused deposition modeling (FDM) offer an attractive prospect for enhancing their mechanical properties and functionality. In this study, the interfacial fracture toughness of a unidirectional hybrid composite fabricated by FDM was studied through mechanical testing. The composite structure comprises acrylonitrile butadiene styrene and carbon fiber-reinforced polylactic acid. Since, de-adhesion or bond failure at the interface can occur under a combination of the different fracture modes, therefore, interfacial fracture toughness, in terms of the critical energy release rate, was characterized using double cantilever beam specimen test for mode I, end-notched flexural specimen test for mode II, and mixed-mode bending specimen test for mixed-mode I/II. Effects of varying process parameters, like printing speed and nozzle temperature, on the interfacial fracture toughness in mode I and II were also investigated. It was found that increasing the nozzle temperature and printing speed enhance the fracture toughness, both in mode I and II, but the effect of increasing nozzle temperature on mode II fracture toughness was quite significant. </jats:p>

Topics
  • Deposition
  • Carbon
  • composite
  • interfacial
  • fracture toughness