People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Smole, Majda Sfiligoj
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (5/5 displayed)
- 2012Uv Polymerization of Poly (N-Isopropylacrylamide) Hydrogel
- 2009Electrokinetic properties of polypropylene-layered silicate Nanocomposite fiberscitations
- 2007Nanofilled polypropylene fibres
- 2004Determining the Surface Free Energy of Cellulose Materials with the Powder Contact Angle Methodcitations
- 2003Characterisation of modified polypropylene fibrescitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Determining the Surface Free Energy of Cellulose Materials with the Powder Contact Angle Method
Abstract
<p>Different treatment processes such as alkaline washing, bleaching, and slack-mercer ization are used to improve the sorption characteristics of cellulose fibers. The differences between the sorption properties of cellulose fibers are measured with tensiometry, and their sorption velocities are measured with liquids of different polarities. From those measurements, contact angles are determined using the Washburn equation. The surface free energy of the cellulose fibers is determined from contact angle data obtained with the Owens-Wendt-Rabel-Kaeble approximation. Results show that among these treatments, slack-mercerization produces the lowest contact angle and the highest surface free fiber energy, and has therefore the largest influence on sorption ability. Viscose fibers (raw and treated) have the lowest contact angle and the highest surface free energy, and are the most hydrophilic compared to lyocell and modal fibers. This is explained by their crystalline structure and the accessibility of their surface groups to polar liquids.</p>