Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Yamaguchi, Satoshi

  • Google
  • 3
  • 36
  • 96

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2022RoBDEMAT: A risk of bias tool and guideline to support reporting of pre-clinical dental materials research and assessment of systematic reviews69citations
  • 2022Interpretable AI Explores Effective Components of CAD/CAM Resin Composites19citations
  • 2022Stability of fatigued and aged ZTA compared to 3Y-TZP and Al2O3 ceramic systems8citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Bonfante, Estevam A.
1 / 14 shared
Jalkh, Ernesto B. Benalcázar
1 / 7 shared
Genova, Luis A.
1 / 1 shared
Witek, Lukasz
1 / 42 shared
Gierthmuehlen, Petra C.
1 / 2 shared
Tebcherani, Sérgio M.
1 / 1 shared
Lopes, Adolfo C. O.
1 / 3 shared
Araújo-Júnior, Everardo N. S. De
1 / 2 shared
Bergamo, Edmara T. P.
1 / 6 shared
Coelho, Paulo
1 / 1 shared
Campos, Tiago M. B.
1 / 4 shared
Chart of publication period
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Bonfante, Estevam A.
  • Jalkh, Ernesto B. Benalcázar
  • Genova, Luis A.
  • Witek, Lukasz
  • Gierthmuehlen, Petra C.
  • Tebcherani, Sérgio M.
  • Lopes, Adolfo C. O.
  • Araújo-Júnior, Everardo N. S. De
  • Bergamo, Edmara T. P.
  • Coelho, Paulo
  • Campos, Tiago M. B.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Interpretable AI Explores Effective Components of CAD/CAM Resin Composites

  • Yamaguchi, Satoshi
Abstract

<jats:p> High flexural strength of computer-aided manufacturing resin composite blocks (CAD/CAM RCBs) are required in clinical scenarios. However, the conventional in vitro approach of modifying materials’ composition by trial and error was not efficient to explore the effective components that contribute to the flexural strength. Machine learning (ML) is a powerful tool to achieve the above goals. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop ML models to predict the flexural strength of CAD/CAM RCBs and explore the components that affect flexural strength as the first step. The composition of 12 commercially available products and flexural strength were collected from the manufacturers and literature. The initial data consisted of 16 attributes and 12 samples. Considering that the input data for each sample were recognized as a multidimensional vector, a fluctuation range of 0.1 was proposed for each vector and the number of samples was augmented to 120. Regression algorithms—that is, random forest (RF), extra trees, gradient boosting decision tree, light gradient boosting machine, and extreme gradient boosting—were used to develop 5 ML models to predict flexural strength. An exhaustive search and feature importance analysis were conducted to analyze the effective components that affected flexural strength. The R<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> values for each model were 0.947, 0.997, 0.998, 0.983, and 0.927, respectively. The relative errors of all the algorithms were within 15%. Among the high predicted flexural strength group in the exhaustive search, urethane dimethacrylate was contained in all compositions. Filler content and triethylene glycol dimethacrylate were the top 2 features predicted by all models in the feature importance analysis. ZrSiO<jats:sub>4</jats:sub> was the third important feature for all models, except the RF model. The ML models established in this study successfully predicted the flexural strength of CAD/CAM RCBs and identified the effective components that affected flexural strength based on the available data set. </jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • strength
  • composite
  • flexural strength
  • random
  • resin
  • machine learning
  • collision-induced dissociation