People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Selver, Erdem
University of Portsmouth
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (20/20 displayed)
- 2024Glass flakes for enhancing mechanical properties of glass/epoxy compositescitations
- 2024Self-healing potential of stitched glass/polypropylene/epoxy hybrid composites with various fiberscitations
- 2023Enhancing the mechanical performance of notched glass/epoxy composite laminates via hybridisation with thermoplastic fibrescitations
- 2022Glass/polypropylene hybrid knitted fabrics for toughening of thermoset compositescitations
- 2022Investigation of the impact and post-impact behaviour of glass and glass/natural fibre hybrid composites made with various stacking sequences: experimental and theoretical analysiscitations
- 2022Influence of yarn hybridisation and fibre architecture on the compaction response of woven fabric preforms during composite manufacturingcitations
- 2022Improving the fracture toughness of glass/epoxy laminates through intra-yarns hybridisationcitations
- 2022Influence of yarn-hybridisation on the mechanical performance and thermal conductivity of composite laminatescitations
- 2021The role of hybridisation and fibre architecture on the post-impact flexural behaviour of composite laminatescitations
- 2021Intra-tow micro-wrapping for damage tolerancecitations
- 2021Experimental and theoretical study of sandwich composites with Z-pins under quasi-static compression loadingcitations
- 2021Mechanical and thermal properties of glass/epoxy composites filled with silica aerogelscitations
- 2020Tensile and flexural properties of glass and carbon fibre composites reinforced with silica nanoparticles and polyethylene glycolcitations
- 2019Acoustic properties of hybrid glass/flax and glass/jute composites consisting of different stacking sequencescitations
- 2019Impact resistance of Z-pin-reinforced sandwich compositescitations
- 2019Impact and damage tolerance of shear thickening fluids-impregnated carbon and glass fabric compositescitations
- 2019Flexural properties of sandwich composite laminates reinforced with glass and carbon Z-pinscitations
- 2018Effect of stacking sequence on tensile, flexural and thermomechanical properties of hybrid flax/glass and jute/glass thermoset compositescitations
- 2016Impact damage tolerance of thermoset composites reinforced with hybrid commingled yarnscitations
- 2013Nanoclay/Polypropylene composite monofilament processing and properties using twin and single screw extruderscitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Self-healing potential of stitched glass/polypropylene/epoxy hybrid composites with various fibers
Abstract
<jats:p> This study compares the impact damage response and self-healing potential of unstitched and stitched glass/polypropylene (PP) fiber reinforced thermoset composite structures. The novelty of this study is weaving preforms with an intra-ply hybridization of glass and thermoplastic PP fibers and stitching these preforms with a unique stitching pattern by considering the effect of stitching fiber types (PP, Kevlar<jats:sup>®</jats:sup>, Dyneema<jats:sup>®</jats:sup>, carbon and silk) on impact damage response and self-healing potential of composites. The mechanical properties of the stitching fiber influenced the composite’s behavior against impact and compressive loads. The unstitched composite deflected more than stitched composites under the same impact energy levels due to delaying of delamination via stitching process. The stitching process reduced the damage areas of composites subjected to 30 J and 60 J impact energies by 57 and 86%, respectively. Structural healing significantly decreased the damaged areas of both unstitched and stitched composite structures up to 87%, while it was more effective on stitched composites. The polypropylene melted and accumulated along the path of the stitch pattern, regardless of whether the stitching fiber was thermoplastic. Due to the reduced impacted area, compression after impact (CAI) strength retention of the stitched composite materials increased by up to 94%. </jats:p>