Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Junaedi, Harri

  • Google
  • 1
  • 2
  • 14

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2024Enhanced damage tolerance and fracture toughness of lightweight carbon-Kevlar fiber hybrid laminate14citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Wagih, Ahmed
1 / 1 shared
Lubineau, Gilles
1 / 11 shared
Chart of publication period
2024

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Wagih, Ahmed
  • Lubineau, Gilles
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Enhanced damage tolerance and fracture toughness of lightweight carbon-Kevlar fiber hybrid laminate

  • Wagih, Ahmed
  • Junaedi, Harri
  • Lubineau, Gilles
Abstract

<jats:p> Low damage tolerance and residual strength are the main drawbacks of carbon fiber composite laminates that limit their application in many lightweight structures. This study demonstrates the exceptional damage tolerance and high fracture toughness of carbon-Kevlar hybrid laminate, where Kevlar plies are placed between two carbon fiber face sheets. Flexural strength after damage and mode I translaminar fracture toughness of carbon and Kevlar and the hybrid laminates were evaluated using three-point bending and single-edge notched bending tests, respectively. The damage mechanisms in the three configurations were investigated using micro-computed tomography and correlated with their mechanical responses. The results showed that the hybrid laminate could sustain 70% of the laminate strength after fiber damage occurs and can sustain the same strength for large strains, unlike carbon and Kevlar fiber laminates, where they both lose their mechanical integrity after fiber breakage. Moreover, this laminate showed 200% and 170% larger specific absorbed energy than carbon and Kevlar laminates, respectively. The improvement can be justified by the propagation of fiber breakage at three different positions in the Kevlar core and the delamination at the carbon-Kevlar interface that allowed larger energy dissipation during fracture. Additionally, it showed 21% and 42.7% larger absolute and specific fracture toughness, respectively, than the carbon fiber laminate. </jats:p>

Topics
  • Carbon
  • tomography
  • strength
  • composite
  • flexural strength
  • bending flexural test
  • fracture toughness