Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Pilla, Srikanth

  • Google
  • 3
  • 8
  • 12

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2023Composites 4.0: Enabling the Modernization of Legacy Manufacturing Assets in South Carolina1citations
  • 2022Experimental analysis on the bonding conditions of thermoset-thermoplastic composite parts manufactured by the hybrid single shot method6citations
  • 2022Design and manufacturing of roller bearing polymeric cages and development of a theoretical model for predicting the roller push-out force5citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Pradeep, Sai Aditya
2 / 2 shared
Deshpande, Amit Makarand
1 / 1 shared
Keskar, Gautami Girish
1 / 1 shared
Zheng, Ting
1 / 2 shared
Kazan, Hakan
1 / 2 shared
Zarei, Alireza
1 / 1 shared
Lukasiewicz, Rob
1 / 1 shared
Driscoll, John
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Pradeep, Sai Aditya
  • Deshpande, Amit Makarand
  • Keskar, Gautami Girish
  • Zheng, Ting
  • Kazan, Hakan
  • Zarei, Alireza
  • Lukasiewicz, Rob
  • Driscoll, John
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Experimental analysis on the bonding conditions of thermoset-thermoplastic composite parts manufactured by the hybrid single shot method

  • Zheng, Ting
  • Pilla, Srikanth
  • Kazan, Hakan
Abstract

<jats:p> The hybrid single shot method is an innovative manufacturing technique that allows thermoset composite sheets to be formed and cured while they are also bonded into an injected thermoplastic body all in a single integrated operation. This integration concept is complex in nature but promising to overcome the drawbacks of the traditional procedures for manufacturing such multi-material structures by reducing the cycle time, energy consumption, and cost of the required tools and machinery. In this study, CF/Epoxy prepreg sheets are selected as the inserted material which is then later deformed and bonded to an injected body made of a polypropylene compound. The bonding between these two dissimilar materials is mostly achieved by taking the advantages of the melt penetration and the tackiness of the prepreg sheet. Therefore, an experimental study is here designed and carried out to evaluate the bonding conditions of the final hybrid parts regarding several influential process parameters. To better monitor the process and analyze the physics behind this integration, a set of real-time process variables are measured and analyzed using an instrumented experimental setup. The results show that the pre-heating time has the largest effect on the bonding strength, and the best combination of the deformation and bonding strength is achieved when the cavity pressure and temperature are at the highest level compared to the other experiments. The maximum bonding strength attained in the optimum process settings was 6.8 MPa which shows a 51% improvement compared to the average value of the other experiments. </jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • compound
  • experiment
  • melt
  • strength
  • composite
  • thermoset
  • thermoplastic