Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Ja, Griggs

  • Google
  • 2
  • 10
  • 5

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2023Influence of different surface finishing protocols on the wear behavior of a lithium disilicate glass-ceramic.citations
  • 2022Relationship between fracture toughness and fractal dimensional increment in two types of dental glass-ceramics with different fracture surface roughness.5citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Satpathy, M.
1 / 1 shared
Kr, Weber
1 / 1 shared
Ss, Marocho
1 / 1 shared
Borba, M.
1 / 5 shared
Sm, Salazar Marocho
1 / 3 shared
Ks, Jodha
1 / 1 shared
Kaur, N.
1 / 5 shared
Duan, Y.
1 / 1 shared
St, Lirette
1 / 1 shared
Jr, Mecholsky Jj
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Satpathy, M.
  • Kr, Weber
  • Ss, Marocho
  • Borba, M.
  • Sm, Salazar Marocho
  • Ks, Jodha
  • Kaur, N.
  • Duan, Y.
  • St, Lirette
  • Jr, Mecholsky Jj
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Influence of different surface finishing protocols on the wear behavior of a lithium disilicate glass-ceramic.

  • Satpathy, M.
  • Kr, Weber
  • Ss, Marocho
  • Ja, Griggs
  • Borba, M.
Abstract

<h4>Purpose</h4>This study aims to evaluate the effect of different finishing protocols on the wear behavior of a lithium disilicate glass-ceramic.<h4>Material and methods</h4>Specimens were produced from lithium disilicate glass-ceramic prefabricated CAD/CAM blocks and divided into three groups, according to the surface treatment (n = 8): control; polishing; glaze. Ceramic specimens were subjected to wear test using a dual-axis chewing simulator. A 49 N load was applied in the axial direction combined with a lateral movement (1 mm path) using a lithium disilicate glass-ceramic spherical piston for a total of 106 cycles. Qualitative analysis of the wear surface was performed using an optical microscope. Quantitative analysis of surface roughness and volume loss was performed using a confocal microscope and a 3D-image editing software, respectively. Surface roughness and volume loss data were analyzed using Friedman's non-parametric statistical test for repeated measures and the Student-Newman-Keuls test (α = 0.050).<h4>Results</h4>There were statistical differences for surface roughness and volume loss of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic specimens in the different experimental conditions (P˂0.001). Control and polishing groups showed similar surface roughness and volume loss values for all testing times. Glaze group had greater wear volume after 103, 104 and 105 cycles. After 106 cycles, surface roughness and volume loss were similar among groups. For the piston, surface roughness was similar over time and among groups.<h4>Conclusions</h4>A distinct wear behavior was found for glazed glass-ceramic specimens in comparison to control and polished specimens. The end of the simulation, the surface roughness and volume loss was similar for the groups.

Topics
  • surface
  • simulation
  • glass
  • glass
  • wear test
  • Lithium
  • ceramic
  • quantitative determination method
  • collision-induced dissociation
  • polishing