Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Stobart, Hilary

  • Google
  • 3
  • 26
  • 7

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2024Symptom-triggered testing improves the detection of early-stage and low-volume resectable advanced-stage high grade serous ovarian cancer5citations
  • 2020Abstract P6-12-10: Method development for a ‘Study within a Trial’ using a cluster stepped wedge trial design: Evaluating a patient decision aid video on patients’ decisional conflict in the PRIMETIME studycitations
  • 2020Abstract P6-12-04: Does the addition of a patient decision aid video reduce decisional conflict in patients considering a de-escalation of radiotherapy trial? Results from the PRIMETIME study2citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Ottridge, Ryan
1 / 1 shared
Sturdy, Lauren
1 / 1 shared
Rosenfeld, Nitzan
1 / 1 shared
Bourne, Tom
1 / 2 shared
Deeks, Jonathan
1 / 4 shared
Timmerman, Dirk
1 / 1 shared
Kristunas, Caroline
1 / 1 shared
Agarwal, Ridhi
1 / 1 shared
Kwong, Fong Lien Audrey
1 / 1 shared
Davenport, Clare
1 / 2 shared
Brenton, James
1 / 1 shared
Gentrymaharaj, Alex
1 / 1 shared
Kehoe, Sean
1 / 1 shared
Sundar, Sudha
1 / 1 shared
Menon, Usha
1 / 1 shared
Neal, Richard
1 / 1 shared
Mallett, Sue
1 / 1 shared
Bhattacharya, Indrani Subarna
2 / 2 shared
Haviland, Joanne S.
1 / 1 shared
Balasopoulou, Ada
2 / 2 shared
Bliss, Judith M.
2 / 2 shared
Coles, Charlotte E.
2 / 2 shared
Turner, Lesley
2 / 3 shared
Stones, Liba
2 / 2 shared
Hopwood, Penelope
2 / 2 shared
Haviland, Joanne
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Ottridge, Ryan
  • Sturdy, Lauren
  • Rosenfeld, Nitzan
  • Bourne, Tom
  • Deeks, Jonathan
  • Timmerman, Dirk
  • Kristunas, Caroline
  • Agarwal, Ridhi
  • Kwong, Fong Lien Audrey
  • Davenport, Clare
  • Brenton, James
  • Gentrymaharaj, Alex
  • Kehoe, Sean
  • Sundar, Sudha
  • Menon, Usha
  • Neal, Richard
  • Mallett, Sue
  • Bhattacharya, Indrani Subarna
  • Haviland, Joanne S.
  • Balasopoulou, Ada
  • Bliss, Judith M.
  • Coles, Charlotte E.
  • Turner, Lesley
  • Stones, Liba
  • Hopwood, Penelope
  • Haviland, Joanne
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Abstract P6-12-10: Method development for a ‘Study within a Trial’ using a cluster stepped wedge trial design: Evaluating a patient decision aid video on patients’ decisional conflict in the PRIMETIME study

  • Stobart, Hilary
  • Bhattacharya, Indrani Subarna
  • Haviland, Joanne S.
  • Balasopoulou, Ada
  • Bliss, Judith M.
  • Coles, Charlotte E.
  • Turner, Lesley
  • Stones, Liba
  • Hopwood, Penelope
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Background: PRIMETIME is a UK-led prospective biomarker directed cohort study aiming to identify a group of breast cancer patients who can safely avoid radiotherapy following breast conserving surgery. This group is deemed to be at such a low risk of local relapse that the potential benefits of radiotherapy are unlikely to outweigh the risks. The uncertainty patients face regarding healthcare decisions is known as ‘decisional conflict’ which may increase when a component of standard of care is removed. Patient decision aids (PDA) are interventions which help patients to weigh up the risks and benefits of treatments. Evidence suggests PDA reduce decisional conflict. The study within a trial (SWAT) concept enables trialists to conduct research embedded within a larger trial in an economic and efficient manner. A SWAT testing whether the introduction of a PDA video reduces decisional conflict was conducted within the PRIMETIME study. The method development of the PRIMETIME SWAT is described.</jats:p><jats:p>Methods: The SWAT was embedded within PRIMETIME after PRIMETIME had opened to recruitment. All eligible patients approached for the PRIMETIME study were eligible for the PRIMETIME SWAT. The SWAT utilised a cluster stepped-wedge trial design. Each cluster consisted of the radiotherapy centre and any peripheral centres referring into that radiotherapy centre. At the outset of the SWAT, all sites utilised the standard written information when discussing the trial with patients as had been envisaged in the original protocol. At pre-specified time-points each cluster “crossed over” to additionally incorporate the PDA video in the information provided to patients eligible for PRIMETIME. Decisional conflict was assessed in clusters prior to and following implementation of the PDA. The PDA was designed in collaboration with PRIMETIME patient advocates to be used in addition to the standard written information, explaining the same risks and benefits of radiotherapy but using an enhanced video format. Access to the PDA was restricted for healthcare professionals as well as patients until the cluster had crossed over to the intervention group to ensure that healthcare professionals did not alter the way in which they presented the study having watched the video. The primary endpoint was reduction in decisional conflict as measured on the decisional conflict scale.</jats:p><jats:p>Discussion: The eligible population for the SWAT was greater than the population of the main PRIMETIME study (i.e. including patients who declined PRIMETIME), to try and obtain a SWAT sample representative of the general population. The cluster aspect of the stepped-wedge design ensured all patients in a cluster would receive uniform information which would simplify processes for sites and avoid cross-contamination between patients. The stepped-wedge aspect enabled all clusters to have access to the PDA by the end of the trial. The PDA was designed to complement the standard written information and explain the risks and benefits of radiotherapy in a different format using a video. If PDA are found to reduce decisional conflict within treatment de-escalation trials, this will provide the evidence to increase resources into the development of PDAs in future trials.</jats:p><jats:p>Citation Format: Indrani Subarna Bhattacharya, Joanne S Haviland, Ada Balasopoulou, Liba Stones, Hilary Stobart, Lesley Turner, Penelope Hopwood, Judith M Bliss, Charlotte E Coles. Method development for a ‘Study within a Trial’ using a cluster stepped wedge trial design: Evaluating a patient decision aid video on patients’ decisional conflict in the PRIMETIME study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-12-10.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • cluster