Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Lin, Ethan Samuel

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2023Automated organoid alignment for clonal response characterization in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomacitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Kratz, Jeremy D.
1 / 2 shared
Koeppel, Luke J.
1 / 1 shared
Riedl, Eleanor E.
1 / 1 shared
Stram, Austin
1 / 3 shared
Warner, Jaimie M.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Kratz, Jeremy D.
  • Koeppel, Luke J.
  • Riedl, Eleanor E.
  • Stram, Austin
  • Warner, Jaimie M.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Automated organoid alignment for clonal response characterization in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

  • Kratz, Jeremy D.
  • Koeppel, Luke J.
  • Riedl, Eleanor E.
  • Lin, Ethan Samuel
  • Stram, Austin
  • Warner, Jaimie M.
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Background: Therapeutic screening Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) relies on well-level assessment for high throughput response evaluation. Patient-derived cancer organoids (PCOs) model subclonal populations, however the significance of resistant populations is uncertain when characterized with well-level response. Using a high-throughput screening assay, we present an automated alignment algorithm to characterize populations of organoid growth as compared to validated well-level therapeutic response assays.</jats:p><jats:p>Methods: High content imaging was performed in low volume (10uL), 96-well angiogenesis plating format (Ibidi, Inc) at 4x objective with 5-frame Z-stack (600um) with brightfield imaging captured at 0h and 72h. Images underwent processing using Gen5 suite (Biotek, Inc) including Z-projection to render organoids into single two-dimensional planes. Baseline objects were defined between 50µm and 750µm, and filtration based on circularity defined as &amp;gt;0.4. Object alignment was performed based on root-mean-square-deviation (RMSD) between all combinations of objects to optimize match determination. This analysis was performed in drug screen of 80 independent agents in early clinical trials in combination with CDK7 inhibitor, SY-5609. Well level viability was performed using standardized 3D CellTiterGlo (CTG, Promega Inc.) (33% v/v). Response was assessed using descriptive statistics, effect size (Glass’s Δ), and Therapeutic Sensitivity Index (TSI) defined as the weighted average between elements with growth from media control versus treated population.</jats:p><jats:p>Results: Z projection of 600um in Low-volume plating (10µL) of matrix suspension yielded 1.68 organoids per µL relative to the traditional hanging drop design (50µL) 0.75 organoids per µL (p&amp;lt;0.005). Organoid alignment across the continuum of RMSD yielded maximum successful matches at 75µm with 66.1% of objects versus 6.7% based on randomly assigned objects across validation experimental sets (n=1380). An optimal circularity value was determined at 0.4; an increase of circularity by 0.1 yielded a &amp;gt;5% reduction in of matched objects, while a decrease in circularity by 0.1 yielded a &amp;lt;5% reduction in unmatched objects. A poor correlation was seen for the percent of growing organoids within a population and well level normalized viability via CTG (R = 0.37). The normalized CTG value had improved in correlation when compared to effect size relative to control (R = 0.54) and TSI (R = 0.56).</jats:p><jats:p>Conclusion: We provide a method for high fidelity alignment of PCOs in low-volume format for matrix-based screening applications. These techniques can be adapted to existing staining protocols to characterize subclonal response in the context of both molecular heterogeneity and clinical outcomes.</jats:p><jats:p>Citation Format: Ethan Samuel Lin, Md Shahadat Hossan, Austin Stram, Eleanor E. Riedl, Luke J. Koeppel, Jaimie M. Warner, Jeremy D. Kratz. Automated organoid alignment for clonal response characterization in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 5327.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • glass
  • glass
  • molecular dynamics
  • two-dimensional