Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Wahab, Sarmed

  • Google
  • 3
  • 8
  • 32

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2024Predicting Confinement Effect of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers on Strength of Concrete using Metaheuristics-based Artificial Neural Networks16citations
  • 2024Comparative Analysis of Shear Strength Prediction Models for Reinforced Concrete Slab–Column Connections8citations
  • 2024Comparative Analysis of Shear Strength Prediction Models for Reinforced Concrete Slab–Column Connections8citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Mahmoudabadi, Nasim Shakouri
3 / 4 shared
Ahmad, Afaq
2 / 13 shared
Waqas, Sarmad
3 / 3 shared
Shabbir, Faisal
1 / 1 shared
Suleiman, Mohamed
1 / 1 shared
Herl, Nouman
3 / 3 shared
Iqbal, Muhammad
2 / 8 shared
Alam, Khurshid
2 / 8 shared
Chart of publication period
2024

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Mahmoudabadi, Nasim Shakouri
  • Ahmad, Afaq
  • Waqas, Sarmad
  • Shabbir, Faisal
  • Suleiman, Mohamed
  • Herl, Nouman
  • Iqbal, Muhammad
  • Alam, Khurshid
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Comparative Analysis of Shear Strength Prediction Models for Reinforced Concrete Slab–Column Connections

  • Mahmoudabadi, Nasim Shakouri
  • Waqas, Sarmad
  • Iqbal, Muhammad
  • Herl, Nouman
  • Alam, Khurshid
  • Wahab, Sarmed
Abstract

<jats:p>This research focuses on a comprehensive comparative analysis of shear strength prediction in slab–column connections, integrating machine learning, design codes, and finite element analysis (FEA). The existing empirical models lack the influencing parameters that decrease their prediction accuracy. In this paper, current design codes of American Concrete Institute 318-19 (ACI 318-19) and Eurocode 2 (EC2), as well as innovative approaches like the compressive force path method and machine learning models are employed to predict the punching shear strength using a comprehensive database of 610 samples. The database consists of seven key parameters including slab depth (ds), column dimension (cs), shear span ratio (av/d), yield strength of longitudinal steel (fy), longitudinal reinforcement ratio (ρl), ultimate load-carrying capacity (Vu), and concrete compressive strength (fc). Compared with the design codes and other machine learning models, the particle swarm optimization-based feedforward neural network (PSOFNN) performed the best predictions. PSOFNN predicted the punching shear of flat slab with maximum accuracy with R2 value of 99.37% and least MSE and MAE values of 0.0275% and 1.214%, respectively. The findings of the study are validated through FEA of slabs to confirm experimental results and machine learning predictions that showed excellent agreement with PSOFNN predictions. The research also provides insight into the application of metaheuristic models along with ANN, revealing that not all metaheuristic models can outperform ANN as usually perceived. The study also highlights superior predictive capabilities of EC2 over ACI 318-19 for punching shear values.</jats:p>

Topics
  • strength
  • steel
  • yield strength
  • finite element analysis
  • machine learning
  • microwave-assisted extraction