Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Dhinakran, V.

  • Google
  • 6
  • 19
  • 67

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (6/6 displayed)

  • 2024A NOVEL DOUBLE-SIDE LASER WELDED THICK PLATE: MICROSTRUCTURE AND NUMERICAL PREDICTION OF TENSILE TESTcitations
  • 2023Manufacturing of multi material wall via fused filament fabrication: An insight characteristics5citations
  • 2023Prediction of static failure in metal inert gas welded nuclear grade pipe 347 SS: Experimentation and finite-element analysis approach1citations
  • 2022Effect of printing characteristics for the incorporation of hexagonal-shaped lattice structure on the PLA polymeric material44citations
  • 2022Influence of Nanosilica Particle Addition on Mechanical and Water Retention Properties of Natural Flax- and Sisal-Based Hybrid Nanocomposites under NaOH Conditions10citations
  • 2022Process optimization of compressive property and dimensional error on wood polylactic acid gyroid-structured polymer composite7citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Subramaniyan, Mohan Kumar
3 / 6 shared
Vellaisamy, Murugan
1 / 1 shared
Sarankumar, T.
1 / 1 shared
Browne, Micheal Agnelo
3 / 5 shared
Vellaisamy, M.
1 / 1 shared
Patil, B. P.
1 / 1 shared
Guo, Lei
1 / 5 shared
Yang, Chunhui
1 / 3 shared
Palaniyappan, Sabarinathan
2 / 4 shared
Natrayan, L.
1 / 27 shared
Kumar, S. Narain
1 / 1 shared
Surendhar, G. J.
1 / 1 shared
Sethupathy, S. Baskara
1 / 3 shared
Mekonnen, Hulusew Ferede
1 / 1 shared
Patil, Pravin P.
1 / 30 shared
Velmurugan, G.
1 / 10 shared
Sekar, S.
1 / 15 shared
Shanmugam, Ragavanantham
1 / 2 shared
Surendhar, Gj
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2023
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Subramaniyan, Mohan Kumar
  • Vellaisamy, Murugan
  • Sarankumar, T.
  • Browne, Micheal Agnelo
  • Vellaisamy, M.
  • Patil, B. P.
  • Guo, Lei
  • Yang, Chunhui
  • Palaniyappan, Sabarinathan
  • Natrayan, L.
  • Kumar, S. Narain
  • Surendhar, G. J.
  • Sethupathy, S. Baskara
  • Mekonnen, Hulusew Ferede
  • Patil, Pravin P.
  • Velmurugan, G.
  • Sekar, S.
  • Shanmugam, Ragavanantham
  • Surendhar, Gj
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Influence of Nanosilica Particle Addition on Mechanical and Water Retention Properties of Natural Flax- and Sisal-Based Hybrid Nanocomposites under NaOH Conditions

  • Sethupathy, S. Baskara
  • Mekonnen, Hulusew Ferede
  • Patil, Pravin P.
  • Velmurugan, G.
  • Sekar, S.
  • Dhinakran, V.
Abstract

<jats:p>Organic filament-based lightweight materials are increasingly being used because of their high strength-to-weight ratio, recyclability, and low cost. The application of nanofillers in addition to natural fibres is a fascinating one. The main purpose of the current experimental investigation is to manufacture and estimate the mechanical material of nanocomposites. Natural fibres like flax and sisal are used as reinforcement; nanosilica particles act as fillers, and epoxy resin as a matrix. The composites were created using the Taguchi L9 orthogonal array and a hand lay-up technique. The mechanical and water retention behaviour of the hybrid composites is based on the following three parameters, each with three different levels: (i) adding different weight ratios of nanofiller (1.5, 3, and 4.5 wt%), (ii) weight ratio of reinforcements (20, 30, and 40 wt%), and (iii) duration of NaOCl conditions (2, 4, and 6 hours). Mechanical possessions like tension, bending, and impact were tested as per the ASTM standard. The tested composites show that 30 wt% reinforcement, 3 wt% nanosilica, and 4 hours of alkaline processing provide the best materials and aquatic preoccupation belongings. When compared to nanofiller composites, nanoparticle-filled composites have 17% evolution in tension, 22% upsurge in flexural strength, 13% in impact strength, and 36% increase in impact strength hygroscopic behaviour. Scanning electron microscopes were used to analyze the fractured structure of hybrid composites. Compared to 1.5 and 4.5 wt% of nanofiller, the 3 wt% of filler provides high interfacial adhesion to the hybrid composites. It helps the reinforcement and matrix to contact each other.</jats:p>

Topics
  • nanoparticle
  • nanocomposite
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • strength
  • flexural strength
  • interfacial
  • resin