Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Krieger, Anja

  • Google
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2022Nafion Composite Membrane Reinforced By Phosphonated Polypentafluorostyrene Nanofiberscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Komma, Miriam
1 / 2 shared
Böhm, Thomas
1 / 6 shared
Kerres, Jochen
1 / 2 shared
Solihul, Muhammad Mumin
1 / 1 shared
Mumin, Muhammad Solihul
1 / 1 shared
Thiele, Simon
1 / 18 shared
Chart of publication period
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Komma, Miriam
  • Böhm, Thomas
  • Kerres, Jochen
  • Solihul, Muhammad Mumin
  • Mumin, Muhammad Solihul
  • Thiele, Simon
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Nafion Composite Membrane Reinforced By Phosphonated Polypentafluorostyrene Nanofibers

  • Komma, Miriam
  • Böhm, Thomas
  • Kerres, Jochen
  • Solihul, Muhammad Mumin
  • Mumin, Muhammad Solihul
  • Krieger, Anja
  • Thiele, Simon
Abstract

<jats:p>The membrane is one of the crucial components of fuel cells. Applying composite membranes for fuel cells is a promising option due to better mechanical properties compared to membranes without reinforcement. Composite membranes can be prepared by combining ionomer with a filler which can be selected from many types of materials, such as polymers, ceramics, carbons, and metals. Filler materials exist in different nanostructures which provide flexible designs for composite membranes. However, the main issue in composite membranes is a trade-off among properties when adjusting the ratio between ionomer and filler, especially between ionic conductivity and mechanical modulus. On the one hand, maintaining high protonic conductivity is possible when small concentrations of reinforcing fillers are incorporated. On the other hand, a high amount of reinforcement can improve the mechanical properties significantly but could result in low protonic conductivity as well. Our strategy to overcome this issue is by employing protonic conductive nanofibers as reinforcement. Electrospinning is a versatile method to transform polymer solutions into long and solid nanofibers. Electrospun fibermats possess a high porosity and contain voids which can be filled with an ionomer like Nafion by spraycoating to form a dense composite membrane.</jats:p><jats:p>We were successful in producing electrospun nanofibers from phosphonated polypentafluorostyrene (PWN70) and unmodified polypentafluorostyrene (PPFSt). PWN70/Nafion and PPFSt/Nafion composite membranes were prepared separately by spraycoating of a Nafion solution into PWN70 and PPFSt fibermats that have comparable thickness and fiber loading. From tensile tests, we found that composite membranes made from PWN70/Nafion and PPFSt/Nafion have much higher Youngs’ modulus (E) than pure Nafion (Figure 1A). Although PWN70/Nafion is a relatively brittle membrane, it has the best Youngs’ modulus and yield stress. Protonic conductivity is also a crucial membrane property which can be determined by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. In Figure 1B, Nafion reinforced by PPFSt fibers has a reduced conductivity due to non-ion-conductive PPFSt. Surprisingly, the protonic conductivity of a PWN70/Nafion composite membrane is similar to spraycoated Nafion. Without reducing much the protonic conductivity, the PWN70/Nafion composite membrane shows comparable ohmic resistance to the spraycoated D2020 in fuel cell operation which has also been done in this work. Since the PWN70 nanofibers are ion-conductive and electro-spinnable, the nanofibers offer benefits when designing fiber-reinforced composite membrane possessing both good mechanical stability and protonic conductivity.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:inline-formula><jats:inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="1500fig1.jpg" xlink:type="simple" /></jats:inline-formula></jats:p><jats:p>Figure 1</jats:p><jats:p />

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • polymer
  • Carbon
  • void
  • porosity
  • ceramic
  • electrospinning
  • fiber-reinforced composite