Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Glenn, Michael

  • Google
  • 2
  • 5
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2019Corrosion Susceptibility of Austenitic Stainless Steels in Direct Carbon Fuel Cellcitations
  • 2018Metal Oxides As Additives to Improve Anode Performance in Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells (MCFC)citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Mathan, Bobby Kannan
2 / 2 shared
Islam, Monirul
2 / 3 shared
Donne, Scott W.
2 / 2 shared
Beyad, Yaser
2 / 3 shared
Allen, Jessica A.
2 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2019
2018

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Mathan, Bobby Kannan
  • Islam, Monirul
  • Donne, Scott W.
  • Beyad, Yaser
  • Allen, Jessica A.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Corrosion Susceptibility of Austenitic Stainless Steels in Direct Carbon Fuel Cell

  • Glenn, Michael
  • Mathan, Bobby Kannan
  • Islam, Monirul
  • Donne, Scott W.
  • Beyad, Yaser
  • Allen, Jessica A.
Abstract

<jats:p>The direct carbon fuel cell (DCFC) is a future energy technology which is an efficient process for electrical energy generation from carbon-based sources. This technology has an extremely high theoretical efficiency due to favourable thermodynamics of the electro-oxidation reactions in the process. However, several technical challenges exist which must be addressed before the technology can be commercialized. One of the challenges is the corrosion of metal parts in the cell which limits the service life of the unit. In recent year, research on the development of new alloys and surface engineering have been done to address the corrosion issues in molten carbonate fuel cells. However, the literature on the corrosion behaviour of metals in a slurry system (coal + carbonate) is limited. </jats:p><jats:p>Austenitic stainless steels are known for their high temperature corrosion resistance and excellent mechanical properties. In this work, the corrosion susceptibility of two types of austenitic stainless steels, i.e. 316L (16 wt.% Cr and 10wt. % Ni) and 235 MA (21 wt.% Cr and 11 wt.% Ni) were compared for fuel cell tank body application. The corrosion behaviour of the two stainless steels were evaluated in a slurry, which contained 20 wt% coal and 80 wt% ternary-eutectic (Li<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>CO<jats:sub>3</jats:sub>: 43.5 mol%, Na<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>CO<jats:sub>3</jats:sub>: 31.5 mol%, and K<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>CO<jats:sub>3</jats:sub>: 25.0 mol%), with nitrogen as a sweep gas at 800⁰C was examined for a 30-day period. The results indicate that the weight gain (due to corrosion product build-up) for both the stainless steels was marginal after 7 day exposure, i.e., 0.4% and 0.5% for 316L and 253 MA, respectively. However, after 30 days exposure, the weight gain increased to 0.98% for 316L, whereas for 253MA the weight gain remained at ~ 0.5%. Thus, the study suggest that 235 MA stainless steel is superior to 316L stainless steel in the coal-carbonate slurry environment. The corrosion mechanisms of the stainless steels will be discussed in the presentation.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • Carbon
  • stainless steel
  • Nitrogen
  • susceptibility
  • high temperature corrosion