Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Banek, Nathan A.

  • Google
  • 5
  • 5
  • 99

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (5/5 displayed)

  • 2022Sustainable conversion of biomass to rationally designed lithium-ion battery graphite.43citations
  • 2018Sustainable conversion of lignocellulose to high-purity, highly crystalline flake potato graphite.56citations
  • 2017Sustainable, Inexpensive Synthesis of High Purity Graphite from Biomass with Excellent Performance in Li-Ion Battery Anodescitations
  • 2016A Silicon Hollow Graphene Nanoshell Li-Ion Anode Composite Materialcitations
  • 2016Synthetic Variations of Hollow Graphene Nanoshells for Li-Ion Battery Anodecitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Wagner, Michael J.
4 / 5 shared
Abele, Dustin T.
2 / 2 shared
Mckenzie, Kevin
5 / 6 shared
Wagner, Michael
1 / 7 shared
Hays, Kevin Alan
2 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2018
2017
2016

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Wagner, Michael J.
  • Abele, Dustin T.
  • Mckenzie, Kevin
  • Wagner, Michael
  • Hays, Kevin Alan
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

A Silicon Hollow Graphene Nanoshell Li-Ion Anode Composite Material

  • Hays, Kevin Alan
  • Wagner, Michael J.
  • Banek, Nathan A.
  • Mckenzie, Kevin
Abstract

<jats:p>The Li-ion battery provides the majority of powertrain energy for today’s electric vehicles (EVs). The usable range of EVs is largely limited by the Li-ion storage capacity in a Li-ion cell. In addition to low range, most EVs require 4 - 12 hours of charge time. Silicon, a Li-alloy alternative anode, has much greater gravimetric and volumetric capacities compared to graphite (3579 mAh/g vs. 372 mAh/g and 8335 mAh/cm<jats:sup>3</jats:sup> vs. 818 mAh/cm<jats:sup>3</jats:sup> for Li<jats:sub>15</jats:sub>Si<jats:sub>4</jats:sub> vs. LiC<jats:sub>6</jats:sub>). In addition to the increase in capacity, Si is nontoxic, highly abundant, and inexpensive. Despite these advantages, the volumetric expansion of Li<jats:sub>x</jats:sub>Si and poor electrical conductivity of Si makes developing a pure silicon anode with reasonable cycle life a seemingly insurmountable challenge. Composite electrodes of Si and C could represent the next-generation of Li-ion anodes for EVs. Hollow graphene nanoshells (HGNS) are a conductive graphitic carbon ~50 nm in diameter that can charge in minutes and have cycle lives of over 1000 cycles with minimal fade making them a promising support material for silicon nanostructures of higher capacity. Utilizing a facile low-temperature solution synthesis method, silicon was synthesized onto the HGNS to produce Si/HGNS composites in high yield and purity. The electrochemical performance of the composite material had a reversible capacity of ~3500 mAh/g Si (1400 mAh/g composite) after a C/20 formation cycle with 80% first cycle Coulombic efficiency. At an increased rate of C/2, a reversible capacity of ~2800 mAh/g Si (1100 mAh/g composite) is achieved with stable cycling performance. Utilizing this solution synthesis method, efficient mixing of Si with HGNS can produce Li-ion anode composites greater than 3 times the capacity of graphite with stable performance at charging rates required for upcoming EV powertrains.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • Carbon
  • composite
  • Silicon
  • electrical conductivity