| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Hagen, Anke
Technical University of Denmark
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (30/30 displayed)
- 2024Fabrication framework for metal supported solid oxide cells via tape castingcitations
- 2024Fabrication framework for metal supported solid oxide cells via tape castingcitations
- 2024Reversible Operation of Metal Supported Solid Oxide Cellscitations
- 2023Performance and sulfur tolerance of a short stack with solid oxide cells using infiltrated strontium titanate based anodescitations
- 2023Low Temperature Performance and Durability of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells with Titanate Based Fuel Electrodes Using Reformate Fuelcitations
- 2022Metal Supported Electrolysis Cellscitations
- 2021Performance of Metal Supported SOFCs Operated in HydrocarbonFuels and at Low (>650 ˚C) Temperaturescitations
- 2020Co-electrolysis of steam and carbon dioxide in large area solid oxide cells based on infiltrated mesoporous oxygen electrodescitations
- 2020Metal Supported SOFCs for Mobile Applications using Hydrocarbon Fuelscitations
- 2019Developing Accelerated Stress Test Protocols for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells and Electrolysers: The European Project AD ASTRAcitations
- 2019Internal reforming on Metal supported SOFCscitations
- 2017Investigation of a Spinel-forming Cu-Mn Foam as an Oxygen Electrode Contact Material in a Solid Oxide Cell Single Repeating Unitcitations
- 2017Progress of SOFC/SOEC Development at DTU Energy: From Materials to Systemscitations
- 2016Performance Factors and Sulfur Tolerance of Metal Supported Solid Oxide Fuel Cells with Nanostructured Ni:GDC Infiltrated Anodescitations
- 2015Performance Factors and Sulfur Tolerance of Metal Supported Solid Oxide Fuel Cells with Nanostructured Ni:GDC Infiltrated Anodescitations
- 2013Defect chemistry, thermomechanical and transport properties of (RE2−xSrx)0.98(Fe0.8Co0.2)1−yMgyO4−δ (RE = La, Pr)citations
- 2013Defect chemistry, thermomechanical and transport properties of (RE 2 - x Sr x ) 0.98 (Fe 0.8 Co 0.2 ) 1 - y Mg y O 4 - δ (RE = La, Pr)citations
- 2012Durable and Robust Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
- 2012Test and Approval Center for Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Technologies: Phase I. Initiation
- 2010Defect Chemistry and Thermomechanical Properties of Ce0.8PrxTb0.2-xO2-deltacitations
- 2009Chromium poisoning of LSM/YSZ and LSCF/CGO composite cathodescitations
- 2009Status of Development and Manufacture of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell at Topsoe Fuel Cell A/S and Risø/DTUcitations
- 2009Status of Development and Manufacture of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell at Topsoe Fuel Cell A/S and Risø/DTUcitations
- 2008Assessment of the cathode contribution to the degradation of anode-supported solid oxide fuel cellscitations
- 2008Defect and electrical transport properties of Nb-doped SrTiO 3citations
- 2008Defect and electrical transport properties of Nb-doped SrTiO3citations
- 2008Defect and electrical transport properties of Nb-doped SrTiO3citations
- 2007Electrochemical Impedance Studies of SOFC Cathodescitations
- 2007Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Development at Topsoe Fuel Cell A/S and Risø National Laboratorycitations
- 2006Break down of losses in thin electrolyte SOFCscitations
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
Performance Factors and Sulfur Tolerance of Metal Supported Solid Oxide Fuel Cells with Nanostructured Ni:GDC Infiltrated Anodes
Abstract
Two metal supported solid oxide fuel cells (active area 16 cm2) with nanostructured Ni:GDC infiltrated anodes, possessing different anode and support microstructures were studied in respect to sulfur tolerance at an operating temperature of 650°C. The studied MS-SOFCs are based on ferretic stainless steel (FeCr) and showed excellent performance characteristics at 650°C with fuel utilization corrected area specific resistances of 0.35 Ωcm2 and 0.7 Ωcm2 respectively. The sulfur tolerance testing was performed by periodic addition of 2, 5, and 10 ppm H2S in hydrogen based fuel under galvanostatic operation at a current load of 0.25 Acm−2. The results were compared with literature on the sulfur tolerance of conventional SOFC Ni/YSZ cermet anode. The comparison in terms of absolute cell resistance increase and relative anode polarization resistance increase indicates, that the nanostructured Ni:GDC MS-SOFC based anode is significantly more sulfur tolerant than the conventional Ni/YSZ cermet anode. Furthermore, it was shown that the believed extension of the electrochemical three-phase-boundary reaction zone in the presence of GDC must be very limited and cannot account for the higher sulfur tolerance of GDC modified SOFC anodes.