Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Mullins, C. Buddie

  • Google
  • 7
  • 27
  • 332

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (7/7 displayed)

  • 2024A Balancing Act2citations
  • 2022Camphene-Assisted Fabrication of Free-Standing Lithium-Ion Battery Electrode Composites7citations
  • 2019Compact lithium-ion battery electrodes with lightweight reduced graphene oxide/poly(acrylic acid) current collectors10citations
  • 2017Reduced-Graphene Oxide/Poly(acrylic acid) Aerogels as a Three-Dimensional Replacement for Metal-Foil Current Collectors in Lithium-Ion Batteries29citations
  • 2017Thermally cross-linked poly(acrylic acid)/reduced-graphene oxide aerogels as a replacement for metal-foil current collectors in lithium-ion batteriescitations
  • 2014A free-standing, flexible lithium-ion anode formed from an air-dried slurry cast of high tap density SnO2, CMC polymer binder and Super-P Li7citations
  • 2012High performance silicon nanoparticle anode in fluoroethylene carbonate-based electrolyte for Li-ion batteries277citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Papa, Philippe E.
1 / 1 shared
Rastogi, Aashi
1 / 1 shared
Lauro, Samantha N.
1 / 1 shared
Broekhuis, Benjamin G.
1 / 1 shared
Burrow, James N.
2 / 2 shared
Page, Zachariah
1 / 1 shared
Daigle, Hugh
1 / 1 shared
Rylski, Adrian K.
1 / 2 shared
Pender, Joshua P.
4 / 4 shared
Xiao, Han
4 / 5 shared
Lauro, Samantha
1 / 1 shared
Weeks, Jason A.
2 / 2 shared
Heller, Adam
5 / 7 shared
Dong, Ziyue
1 / 1 shared
Cavallaro, Kelsey A.
1 / 1 shared
Klavetter, Kyle C.
4 / 4 shared
Meece-Rayle, Mackenzie A.
2 / 2 shared
Ha, Heonjoo
2 / 6 shared
Souza, J. Pedro De
3 / 3 shared
Lin, Jie
2 / 3 shared
Snider, Jonathan L.
2 / 7 shared
Cho, Joon Hee
1 / 1 shared
Cell, Trevor H.
1 / 1 shared
Tu, Han
1 / 1 shared
Davy, Nicholas C.
1 / 2 shared
Abel, Paul R.
1 / 1 shared
Lin, Yong-Mao
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2022
2019
2017
2014
2012

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Papa, Philippe E.
  • Rastogi, Aashi
  • Lauro, Samantha N.
  • Broekhuis, Benjamin G.
  • Burrow, James N.
  • Page, Zachariah
  • Daigle, Hugh
  • Rylski, Adrian K.
  • Pender, Joshua P.
  • Xiao, Han
  • Lauro, Samantha
  • Weeks, Jason A.
  • Heller, Adam
  • Dong, Ziyue
  • Cavallaro, Kelsey A.
  • Klavetter, Kyle C.
  • Meece-Rayle, Mackenzie A.
  • Ha, Heonjoo
  • Souza, J. Pedro De
  • Lin, Jie
  • Snider, Jonathan L.
  • Cho, Joon Hee
  • Cell, Trevor H.
  • Tu, Han
  • Davy, Nicholas C.
  • Abel, Paul R.
  • Lin, Yong-Mao
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

A Balancing Act

  • Papa, Philippe E.
  • Rastogi, Aashi
  • Lauro, Samantha N.
  • Broekhuis, Benjamin G.
  • Mullins, C. Buddie
  • Burrow, James N.
Abstract

<p>Lithium-ion battery electrodes are traditionally comprised of a cathode or anode material, a carbon conductive additive, and a polymeric binder. The conductive additive and binder are traditionally considered electrochemically inactive; however, the organization of the carbon-binder matrix in 3D space significantly alters electrode physical properties such as electrical conductivity and porosity, resulting in changes to electrochemical performance. While many experimental studies have altered the mass fraction and type of conductive additive, this study systematically studies the volume fraction of electrode components. Electrodes composed of lithium titanate (LTO) active material and SuperP conductive additive across six different electrode compositions from 20-70 vol% LTO and three different electrode film thicknesses of approximately 70, 125, and 225 μm were evaluated. Electrode structures were observed via scanning electron microscopy and electronic conductivities were measured with 4-point probe analysis. Notably, electrochemical performance described as different figures of merit are maximized for different electrode compositions. For example, while thin electrodes with maximal volume fractions of LTO achieve superior volumetric energy density, power density is maximized for thicker electrodes with an optimal volume fraction of conductive additive. This study demonstrates the importance of balancing overpotential arising from ohmic drop and concentration polarization.</p>

Topics
  • density
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • Carbon
  • energy density
  • scanning electron microscopy
  • Lithium
  • porosity
  • electrical conductivity