Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Browning, Katie L.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 3
  • 8

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2022Benchmarking Solid-State Batteries Containing Sulfide Separators: Effects of Electrode Composition and Stack Pressure8citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Tsai, Wan-Yu
1 / 5 shared
Nanda, Jagjit
1 / 4 shared
Yang, Guang
1 / 13 shared
Chart of publication period
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Tsai, Wan-Yu
  • Nanda, Jagjit
  • Yang, Guang
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Benchmarking Solid-State Batteries Containing Sulfide Separators: Effects of Electrode Composition and Stack Pressure

  • Tsai, Wan-Yu
  • Browning, Katie L.
  • Nanda, Jagjit
  • Yang, Guang
Abstract

<jats:p>Integrating sulfide separators into solid-state batteries (SSBs) containing high energy cathodes typically requires one or more materials and engineering solutions including: (i) applying interfacial coatings to mitigate electrolyte decomposition, (ii) applying high stack pressures to form robust solid-solid contacts, and (iii) using alloying anodes to avoid Li dendrite formation. Despite the promise of these approaches, a lack of standardized testing protocols makes it difficult to directly compare results among different studies. To address this problem, the present work benchmarks the performance of SSBs containing <jats:italic>β</jats:italic>-Li<jats:sub>3</jats:sub>PS<jats:sub>4</jats:sub> (LPS) separators and composite cathodes. By systematically varying the anode/cathode composition and stack pressure, this work demonstrates that cathode design is a major bottleneck for solid-state cells cycled at low rates (&lt;100 µA cm<jats:sup>-</jats:sup><jats:sup>2</jats:sup>). <jats:italic>Operando</jats:italic> stack pressure measurements show that, while mechanical confinement generally promotes higher active material utilization and cycling stability, this strategy alone does not address interfacial reactivity between LPS and high voltage cathodes. These results also demonstrate that stress evolution during cycling is dominated by volume changes at the Li metal anode. Finally, we show that FeS<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> cathodes with moderate operating voltages (&lt;3 V vs Li/Li<jats:sup>+</jats:sup>) exhibit superior cycling performance compared to high voltage cathodes by facilitating formation of stable cathode/electrolyte interfaces.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • composite
  • interfacial
  • decomposition