| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Tiercelin, Nicolas
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (23/23 displayed)
- 2024Plasmon-driven creation of magnetic topological structures
- 2023The Role of Ferromagnetic Layer Thickness and Substrate Material in Spintronic Emitterscitations
- 2022Ultrafast manipulation of magnetic anisotropy in a uniaxial intermetallic heterostructure TbCo 2 /FeCocitations
- 2022Highly Efficient Terahertz Spintronic Emitter Integrated with Optimized Photonic Crystalcitations
- 2022Composite Multiferroic Terahertz Emitter: Polarization Control via an Electric Fieldcitations
- 2021Polarization control of THz emission using spin-reorientation transition in spintronic heterostructurecitations
- 2021THz spintronic emitters with magnetoelectric control of the polarization and applications to polarimetry
- 2021Increasing the efficiency of a spintronic thz emitter based on wse2/fecocitations
- 2021[Invited] THz spintronic emitters with magnetoelectric control of the polarization and applications to polarimetry
- 2020E-field control of magnetization and susceptibility of AFE-based YIG/PLZST heterostructurecitations
- 2020Photoinduced spin dynamics in a uniaxial intermetallic heterostructure $$hbox {TbCo}_2/hbox {FeCo}$$citations
- 2020Ferromagnetism in the Ferromagnetic Yttrium Iron Garnet Film/Ferromagnetic Intermetallic Compound Heterostructurecitations
- 2019Resistivity of Manganite Thin Film Under Straincitations
- 2019Magnetic Interactions on Oxide Ferromagnet/Ferromagnetic Intermetallide Interfacecitations
- 2019MOKE Magnetometer Studies of Evaporated Ni and Ni/Cu Thin Films onto Different Substratescitations
- 2019Intrinsic versus shape anisotropy in micro-structured magnetostrictive thin films for magnetic surface acoustic wave sensorscitations
- 2019Intrinsic versus shape anisotropy in micro-structured magnetostrictive thin films for magnetic surface acoustic wave sensorscitations
- 2018SPIN INTERACTIONS AT THE INTERFACES FERROMAGNETIC OXIDE/FERROMAGNETIC INTERMETALLIC SUPERLATTICE
- 20141 to 220 GHz complex permittivity behavior of flexible polydimethylsiloxane substratecitations
- 2014Effect of thickness and deposition rate on the structural and magnetic properties of evaporated Fe/Al thin filmscitations
- 2014Characterization of multi-layered nanopore structure
- 2012A millimeter-wave elastomeric microstrip phase shiftercitations
- 2003Silicon based optical scanner using PDMS as torsion springscitations
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
MOKE Magnetometer Studies of Evaporated Ni and Ni/Cu Thin Films onto Different Substrates
Abstract
The Magneto-Optic Kerr Effect (MOKE) technique has been used to investigate the magnetic properties of Ni thin films, with thickness t ranging from 9 to 163 nm, evaporated onto several substrates (glass, Si (111), mica and Cu) with and without an evaporated Cu underlayer. The MOKE observations were correlated with the surface morphology inferred from Scanning Electron Microscope images and with the structural properties (grain size and strain). Some interesting behaviors of the coercive field (with values in the 2 to 151 Oe range), the squareness (between 0.1 and 0.91) and the saturation field (25 to 320 Oe) are observed as a function of t, the substrate and the Cu underlayer. A thickness dependent stress-induced anisotropy is found in these films. The differences between the present MOKE results and the ones obtained from the Vibrating Sample magnetometer (VSM) are highlighted. The former describe the surface magnetism of these systems, while the latter are attributed to the whole volume of the sample.