People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Evans, Gareth
University of Manchester
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (5/5 displayed)
- 2024Extended panel testing in ovarian cancer reveals BRIP1 as the third most important predisposition genecitations
- 2022Genome-wide association analysis identifies a susceptibility locus for sporadic vestibular schwannoma at 9p21citations
- 2018Penetrance estimates for BRCA1, BRCA2 (also applied to Lynch syndrome) based on presymptomatic testing: a new unbiased method to assess risk?citations
- 2017Pathology update to the Manchester Scoring System based on testing in over 4000 familiescitations
- 2017The impact of a panel of 18 single nucleotide polymorphisms on breast cancer risk in women attending a UK familial-screening clinic: A case-control studycitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Penetrance estimates for BRCA1, BRCA2 (also applied to Lynch syndrome) based on presymptomatic testing: a new unbiased method to assess risk?
Abstract
Purpose:The identification of BRCA1, BRCA2 or mismatch repair (MMR)pathogenic gene variants in familial breast/ovarian/colorectal cancer families facilitates predictive genetic testing of at risk relatives. However, controversy still exists regarding overall lifetime risks of cancer in individuals testing positive. <br/><br/>Methods:We assessed the penetrance of BRCA1, BRCA2, MLH1 and MSH2 mutations in men and women using Bayesian calculations based on ratios of positive to negative pre-symptomatic testing by 10-year age cohorts. Mutation position was also assessed for BRCA1/BRCA2.<br/><br/>Results:Using results from 2264 pre-symptomatic tests in First Degree Relatives (FDRs) of mutation carriers inBRCA1 and BRCA2 and 646 FDRs of patients with MMR mutations, we assessed overall associated cancerpenetrance to age of 68 years as 73% (95% CI:61-82%) for BRCA1, 60% (95%CI:49-71%) for BRCA2, 95% (95% CI:76-99%) for MLH1 and 61% (95% CI:49-76%) for MSH2. There was no evidence for significant penetrance for males in BRCA1 or BRCA2 families and males had equivalent penetrance to Lynch syndrome females. Mutation position and degree of family history influenced penetrance in BRCA2 but not BRCA1.<br/><br/>Conclusion:We describe a new method for assessing penetrance in cancer prone syndromes. Results are in keeping with published prospective series and present modern day estimates for overall disease penetrance that bypasses retrospective series biases.<br/>