People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Woodward, Emma
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (3/3 displayed)
- 2024Extended panel testing in ovarian cancer reveals BRIP1 as the third most important predisposition genecitations
- 2018Penetrance estimates for BRCA1, BRCA2 (also applied to Lynch syndrome) based on presymptomatic testing: a new unbiased method to assess risk?citations
- 2017Pathology update to the Manchester Scoring System based on testing in over 4000 familiescitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Pathology update to the Manchester Scoring System based on testing in over 4000 families
Abstract
Background: Whilst the requirement for thresholds for testing for mutations in BRCA1/2 is being questioned, they are likely to remain for individuals unaffected by a relevant cancer. It is still useful to provide pre-testing likelihoods, but models need to take into account tumour pathology.Methods: The Manchester scoring system (MSS) is a well utilised, simple, paper based model for assessing carrier probability that already incorporates pathology data. We have used mutation testing data from 4115 unrelated samples from affected non-Jewish individuals alongside tumour pathology to further refine the scoring system.Results: Adding additional points for high grade serous ovarian cancer <60 (HGSOC=+2) and adding grade score to those with triple negative breast cancer, whilst reducing the score for those with HER2+ breast cancer (-6),resulted in significantly improved sensitivity and minor improvements in specificity to the MSS.Sporadic HGSOC <60 years thus reached a score of 15-19 points within the 10% grouping consistent with the 15/113-13.2% that were identified with a BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant. Validation in a population series of ovarian cancer from Cambridge showed high sensitivity at the 10% threshold 15/17 (88.2%).Conclusions: The new pathology adjusted Manchester Score MSS3 appears to provide an effective and simple to use estimate of the 10% and 20% thresholds for BRCA1/2 likelihood. For unaffected individuals, the 20 point (20%) threshold in their affected first degree relative can be used to determine eligibility at the 10% threshold.