People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Evans, Gareth
University of Manchester
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (5/5 displayed)
- 2024Extended panel testing in ovarian cancer reveals BRIP1 as the third most important predisposition genecitations
- 2022Genome-wide association analysis identifies a susceptibility locus for sporadic vestibular schwannoma at 9p21citations
- 2018Penetrance estimates for BRCA1, BRCA2 (also applied to Lynch syndrome) based on presymptomatic testing: a new unbiased method to assess risk?citations
- 2017Pathology update to the Manchester Scoring System based on testing in over 4000 familiescitations
- 2017The impact of a panel of 18 single nucleotide polymorphisms on breast cancer risk in women attending a UK familial-screening clinic: A case-control studycitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
The impact of a panel of 18 single nucleotide polymorphisms on breast cancer risk in women attending a UK familial-screening clinic: A case-control study
Abstract
Background:Breast cancer familial-risk clinics offer screening and preventive strategies. Whilst BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic testing provides important risk information for some women, panels of more common breast cancer risk genetic variants may have relevance to greater numbers of women with familial risk.<br/>Methods:Three polygenic risk scores(PRS) based on 18 single nucleotide polymorphisms(SNPs) were investigated in a case-control study of women attending a familial-risk clinic. PRS were derived from published general European population allele odds ratios and frequencies (18-SNPs-SNP18). In women with BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations, 3 SNPs/13 SNPs, respectively generated the PRS estimates.In total 364 incident breast cancer cases(112 with BRCA1/2 mutations) were matched to 1605 controls(691-BRCA1/2) by age last mammogram and BRCA1/2 genetic test result. 87 women with cancer before attendance were also considered. Logistic regression was used to measure PRS performance through odds ratios per inter-quartile range(IQ-OR) and calibration of the observed to expected(O/E) logarithm relative risk when unadjusted and adjusted for phenotypic risk factors assessed by the Tyrer-Cuzick(TC) model.<br/>Results:SNP18 was predictive for non-carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations (IQ-OR 1.55, 95%CI:1.29-1.87, O/E 96%). Findings were unaffected by adjustment from TC (IQ-OR 1.56, 95%CI:1.29-1.89) or when prior cancers were included (IQ-OR 1.55, 95%CI:1.30-1.87). There was some evidence to support polygenic scores with weights for individuals with BRCA1/2 mutations (BRCA1 IQ-OR 1.44, 95%CI:1.17-1.76;BRCA2 IQ-OR 1.44, 95%CI:0.90-2.31).<br/>Conclusion:Polygenic risk scores may be used to refine risk assessment for women at increased familial risk who test negative/have low likelihood of BRCA1/2 mutations. They may alter the recommended prevention strategy for many women attending family-history clinics.<br/>