People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Gaydecki, Patrick
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (8/8 displayed)
- 2017Structural Health Monitoring Using Lamb Wave Reflections and Total Focusing Method for Image Reconstructioncitations
- 2016Lamb Waves Boundary Reflections in an Aluminium Plate for Defect Detection related to Structural Health Monitoring.
- 2011Initial studies on the use of electric field for imaging rebars embedded within concrete
- 2007Flood member detection for real-time structural health monitoring of sub-sea structures of offshore steel oilrigscitations
- 2005Continuous monitoring guided wave encoded sensor for oil rig flooded member detectioncitations
- 2005An axisymmetric guided wave encoded system for flood detection of oil rig cross-beamscitations
- 2005A combined Q and heterodyne sensor incorporating real-time DSP for reinforcement imaging, corrosion detection and material characterisationcitations
- 2000Haemodynamic effects of increasing angle of head up tiltcitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Haemodynamic effects of increasing angle of head up tilt
Abstract
<p>Objective - To investigate the haemodynamic effects of varying the angle of head up tilt. Methods - 20 healthy subjects (12 female, eight male; mean (SD) age 33.6 (8.4) years) underwent head up tilt for five minutes to each of four angles of tilt in random order, with a five minute rest period at the horizontal between each angle. Forearm blood flow was measured using intermittent occlusion mercury strain gauge plethysmography at two and five minutes. Subjects underwent continuous monitoring of heart rate, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) by Finapres and cardiac output and stroke volume by impedance cardiography. Each variable was measured at two and five minutes, averaged over the period of blood flow measurement. Results - Every haemodynamic variable at each angle was significantly different from supine values. Head up tilt produced progressive increases in heart rate (11-21%), SBP (12-21%), and DBP (20-33%) with increasing tilt angle. However, although 45°produced significantly less haemodynamic effect, there were no significant differences for angles between 60° and 90°. Cardiac output fell on head up tilt by 17-20% and stroke volume by 28-34%, but increasing tilt angle produced no significant additional reduction in cardiac output and stroke volume because of increases in heart rate and vasoconstriction. Conclusions - Angles <60°produce significantly less haemodynamic effects than steeper angles. Increasing tilt angle beyond 60°produces no apparent additional effect on cardiac output or sympathetic tone. Increasing tilt angle beyond 60°confers no additional orthostatic stress and may not affect the sensitivity and specificity of head up tilt testing as previously thought. Sixty degrees of tilt is a more practical angle for support of a syncopal patient and is recommended.</p>